Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript preparation, guiding authors through the complex stages of publishing for high-impact journals like PNAS Nexus. It does not write content, but rather diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it requires addressing open access rules, polishing the significance statement, refining figures, or structuring the rebuttal. It ensures authors follow the optimal, structured path from initial concept to final submission.

A comprehensive checklist for preparing academic manuscripts for submission to major financial journals. It guides authors through formatting rules, ensuring double-blind anonymization, preparing the Internet Appendix, writing a detailed cover letter, and addressing mandatory code release conditions, ensuring readiness before final portal submission.

This comprehensive tool guides researchers in drafting rigorous, point-by-point responses to referee reports (R&R). It ensures that every comment is systematically addressed, classifying fixes and providing structured revisions. Critically, it mandates that all substantive fixes must be backed by real, reproducible re-runs, citing specific numbers generated via an execution bridge to maintain scientific rigor.

This comprehensive guide serves as a router for structuring a high-quality academic manuscript targeting The Accounting Review (TAR). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current stage of the research—whether it's an initial vague idea, preliminary results, or addressing reviewer feedback—and recommends the next specialized skill module to use, ensuring a methodical progression from topic selection through final rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

A comprehensive guide designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to World Development (WD) via Elsevier Editorial Manager. This checklist ensures authors complete the required steps for double-anonymization, verify abstract/keyword limits, and properly include all necessary declarations (e.g., funding, ethics, conflict of interest) before final submission.

This router is designed to guide researchers through the complex, multidisciplinary workflow of writing a manuscript for World Development (WD). It helps users determine the correct next step—whether the paper is quantitative, purely qualitative, or mixed-methods—at every stage, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to robust revision, rebuttal, and final submission. It ensures the work meets the high bar of real-world development relevance.