Skill UI

Codified expertise for sequencing work orders, balancing discrete and batch lines, reducing changeover time, and shielding bottlenecks using FCS, DBR, and SMED so manufacturing meets commitments despite disruptions.

A comprehensive guide to simulating Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks using industry-standard tools like Bettercap, Ettercap, and mitmproxy. This technique is strictly for authorized penetration testing environments to assess cryptographic controls, validate TLS certificate pinning, and test network defense mechanisms against ARP/DNS spoofing and sniffing.

A comprehensive guide for security professionals on detecting and preventing ARP spoofing and poisoning attacks. The skill covers multiple layers of defense, including implementing Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) on managed switches, utilizing ARPWatch for continuous monitoring, performing deep packet inspection with Wireshark, and developing custom Python scripts for real-time anomaly detection. Essential for mitigating Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks at Layer 2.

This guide details how to simulate ARP spoofing attacks in controlled, authorized lab environments. It demonstrates Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) risks by poisoning the ARP cache, allowing users to test network detection capabilities (IDS/IPS, DAI) and validate the effectiveness of security controls like port security and 802.1X. This skill is strictly for authorized penetration testing and educational purposes.

This skill simulates SSL stripping and Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks using specialized tools like Bettercap and sslstrip. It is designed for authorized penetration testing to assess a web application's resilience against downgrade attacks. Users can test if HSTS headers are properly enforced, if TLS certificates are correctly validated, and if sensitive data remains encrypted throughout the session.

This skill enforces disciplined SLO definition based on SRE principles, ensuring that reliability promises are measurable and actionable. It guides users in selecting the right SLI (Service Level Indicator), accurately calculating error budgets, setting multi-window burn-rate alerts, and reviewing existing SLO documents for common architectural flaws (e.g., targets too aggressive, wrong SLI selection). Ideal for defining, reviewing, and maintaining service reliability commitments.