Skill UI

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in technical papers, particularly for electronics and information processing fields. It covers the critical pillars of documentation: environment setup, data sourcing and preprocessing, full algorithmic disclosure (including pseudo-code and hyperparameters), and robust statistical evaluation. By adopting these standards, authors can transform their work from potentially unverifiable results into credible, verifiable scientific contributions suitable for top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC). It helps assess the fit, scope, and required evidence for applied security papers, ensuring the manuscript is properly reframed from academic theory to deployable, operational defenses. Use this tool for venue selection and submission strategy.

This guide helps researchers determine the suitability of their energy-related manuscripts for the Applied Energy journal. It shifts the focus from single-device performance or component novelty to generalizable, systems-level insights. Key areas include energy-systems modeling, decarbonization pathways, techno-economic analysis (TEA), life cycle assessment (LCA), and assessing integrated energy transitions across sectors.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for evaluating systems research, particularly for top-tier conferences like ATC. It provides detailed instructions on designing reproducible experiments, establishing fair baselines, utilizing realistic workloads, and reporting critical metrics such as tail latency, variance, and resource cost, ensuring the highest level of scientific rigor.

A comprehensive set of reusable patterns for structured incident triage in AWS environments. Includes pre-built Logs Insights queries for detecting errors, latency spikes, cold starts, and OOM events. Also provides systematic correlation methods linking CloudWatch alarms to deployment events, and a decision tree to narrow the blast radius scope from account to resource.

This comprehensive audit guide helps authors prepare their research papers for the CAV submission portal. It covers crucial steps including selecting the correct paper category (Regular, Short Tool, etc.), adhering to LNCS formatting and page limits, and performing technical double-blind anonymity sweeps. Use this checklist to mitigate risks like identity leaks and filing errors before the final deadline.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

Provides rigorous guidelines for conducting robust, verifiable, and reproducible evaluations in networking research. It emphasizes moving beyond simple simulations by demanding the use of real target platforms, documenting full system provenance (traces and configs), establishing honestly tuned baselines, and reporting detailed measurement statistics and uncertainty. Essential for authors aiming for top-tier conference submissions.

A comprehensive guide for drafting the Related Work section for top-tier networking conferences (e.g., CoNEXT, SIGCOMM). It emphasizes moving beyond simple literature summaries to create a 'delta argument'—clearly defining what the paper contributes over the closest prior work. Guidelines cover covering specific networking 'lanes' (like IMC, NSDI, SIGMETRICS), maintaining double-anonymous citations, and ensuring the contribution is concrete and testable.

This comprehensive guide details the academic review pipeline for CoNEXT conference submissions. It covers double-anonymous double-blind review, the two-round TPC process, and the critical nature of the one-shot "major revision," which functions similarly to a journal's revise-and-resubmit cycle. It provides authors with strategic insights to structure their research for rigorous academic scrutiny.

This comprehensive audit guide assists researchers in preparing papers for CoNEXT submission. It covers critical workflow stages, including choosing the correct submission cycle (December or June), adhering to ACM acmart formatting and strict page budgets, managing the two-step registration process, ensuring double-anonymous review compliance, and implementing essential security checks to prevent identity leaks in artifacts and metadata.