Skill UI

Provides a comprehensive guide to the rigorous editorial standards and submission protocols for the Review of Finance. It covers double-blind review requirements, the two-round decision philosophy, common desk screening patterns, and critical timing expectations (Regular vs. Fast-Track). This resource is essential for authors aiming to publish in top-tier finance journals by adhering strictly to academic integrity and compliance rules.

A comprehensive, final preflight checklist designed for submitting scientific manuscripts to top-tier journals. It ensures every critical element—from statistical rigor, data availability, and ethical compliance to formatting, figures, and references—is fully resolved, preventing editorial rejection or major revisions upon initial submission.

This comprehensive audit guide walks through the critical, multi-gate checks required for submitting academic papers to conferences like SenSys. It covers technical formatting rules (page limits, templates), administrative compliance (deadlines, author conflicts), and critically, advanced identity leak sweeping (hardware, deployment details) to ensure the paper is fully anonymous and compliant before final submission.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing manuscripts for high-level academic publication, focusing specifically on data availability and transparency. It guides users through drafting the required data availability statement, depositing data and code in public repositories (e.g., OSF, Zenodo), and methods for documenting restricted or qualitative sources to ensure maximum reproducibility and ethical compliance.

This guide provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to specialized journals (e.g., Social Forces via ScholarOne). It details critical compliance points such as double-anonymization, adherence to the 10,000-word limit (including references), panel count limits, and mandatory style requirements (Chicago 17th). It is designed to help authors catch common formatting and anonymity failures before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for auditing SIGGRAPH technical paper submissions. It details critical deadlines (two-step process), required formatting (ACM acmart, page limits), and necessary supplementary materials like videos and representative images. Use this checklist before finalizing your submission to ensure compliance and avoid mechanical rejection.

A comprehensive audit guide for preparing academic papers for the SOSP conference. This checklist details critical compliance points, including strict deadlines (abstract registration and full paper upload), strict formatting rules (12-page limit, two-column layout), robust anonymization techniques, and conflict declaration best practices. Use this before uploading any material to ensure high quality and avoid desk rejection.

A comprehensive checklist detailing the final pre-submission steps for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) via SageTrack/ScholarOne Manuscript Central. It guides authors through masking, ASA style compliance, abstract formatting, and fee verification to ensure the manuscript meets all journal requirements and avoids temporary rejection.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting academic manuscripts to major journals. It ensures strict compliance with publishing standards, covering double-blind anonymization, required AI disclosure statements, ORCID linking, adherence to specific formatting rules (e.g., Chicago style, page limits), and data authenticity requirements for research integrity.

This skill details the rigorous process of converting raw statistical outputs into self-contained, publication-ready tables and figures for top-tier academic journals. It ensures compliance with strict house styles, covering sample selection, descriptive statistics, main regression results, and specific formatting for DiD, RDD, and event studies, all while adhering to strict page limits and providing economic magnitude interpretation.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for authors responding to peer reviews and engaging with a shepherd during major security symposium cycles (like USENIX Security). It details the technical mechanics of writing effective rebuttals, addressing compliance gaps (e.g., ethics/disclosure), and managing limited revisions during the post-acceptance shepherding phase.

A comprehensive audit checklist for designing and evaluating security experiments, adhering to the highest academic standards (e.g., USENIX Security). It guides users through verifying adaptive attacker models, calculating precision at realistic base rates, ensuring statistical honesty for stochastic results, and maintaining ethical compliance when working with live systems.