Skill UI

This router guides the entire workflow for developing a high-quality academic manuscript targeting the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users determine the next necessary step—be it theory development, data analysis, refining contributions, or preparing for submission and rebuttal—ensuring methodological rigor and structural completeness throughout the writing process.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning from summarizing individual studies to synthesizing knowledge across a field. It teaches the critical, integrative voice required for publishing high-impact reviews, covering structure (Introduction Arc), methodology (APA 7), and critical argumentation (Synthesis vs. Summary). Essential for systematic literature reviews.

This skill helps authors assess the suitability of their accounting manuscripts for prestigious academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It analyzes the paper's fit, rigor, methodological strength, and structure against top-tier academic standards in areas like valuation, disclosure, and information economics. It provides actionable feedback on potential rejection risks and alternative venues.

This guide teaches authors how to refine the positioning of their manuscript for top academic finance journals (like RFS, JF, JFE). It moves beyond simple literature reviews by defining a precise, falsifiable 'delta'—a unique gap—against established canonical theories and the most recent competitor research. Mastering this skill is critical for successfully defending novelty claims in competitive academic fields.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the RAND Journal of Economics (RJE). It details how to build a robust, reproducible replication package, focusing on creating a master script, pinning the computational environment, and properly documenting restricted datasets. It specifically addresses RJE's unique policy, which does not mandate formal data or code deposits, while ensuring academic rigor is maintained for reviewers.

Guides researchers on transforming raw econometric output into publication-ready, self-contained exhibits suitable for high-impact academic journals. Covers strict formatting, page-cap discipline, and structuring complex market behavior, welfare impacts, and elasticity matrices to ensure the core argument is clear and concise.

This guide teaches how to transition from a general literature survey to a precise, high-impact staking of position, particularly for top-tier finance journals like RoF. It emphasizes identifying the 3-6 closest frontier papers, clearly articulating the 'delta' (what your paper adds), and bridging the gap between empirical evidence and theoretical mechanisms. Mastery of this skill is crucial for surviving rigorous academic peer review.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the rigorous editorial standards and submission protocols for the Review of Finance. It covers double-blind review requirements, the two-round decision philosophy, common desk screening patterns, and critical timing expectations (Regular vs. Fast-Track). This resource is essential for authors aiming to publish in top-tier finance journals by adhering strictly to academic integrity and compliance rules.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the mandatory submission process for the Review of Finance (RoF). It covers crucial details including fee structures (Regular vs. Fast-Track), manuscript length (60-page cap), abstract word limits, formatting standards, double-blind anonymity requirements, Chicago citation style, and necessary ethical disclosures. Use this guide before uploading to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research papers in competitive robotics conferences. It teaches authors how to move beyond simple literature review by establishing clear, verifiable contrasts with existing work across multiple academic lanes (e.g., RSS, ICRA, CoRL, Journals). This methodology ensures the paper's novelty is rigorously defensible.

A guide to navigating the rigorous academic publication pipeline, detailing stages such as early rejection, rebuttal, one-shot revision, and shepherding. It helps authors understand reviewer focus areas (e.g., evaluation realism, contribution) and plan strategic responses to maximize acceptance chances in top-tier venues.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research papers, particularly in computer graphics and visualization fields (like SIGGRAPH). It dictates how to match technical claims (e.g., 'higher quality,' 'faster') to verifiable evidence, including head-to-head comparisons against State-of-the-Art (SOTA), detailed metric reporting (PSNR, SSIM, Hausdorff), performance timing linked to specific hardware, and robust user studies. Essential for achieving academic rigor and pre-empting domain reviewer objections.