Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for researchers ensuring the highest level of open-science reproducibility for academic submissions (e.g., FSE). It details how to map every research claim (numbers, techniques) to verifiable evidence, pin technical provenance (SHAs, model IDs), manage data availability statements, and achieve defined degrees of reproducibility (Turnkey, Scripted).

A comprehensive audit checklist for preparing research submissions for FSE. This guide covers critical steps including meeting two-stage deadlines (registration and submission), adhering to strict ACM formatting and page budgets, ensuring heavy double-anonymous anonymity by scrubbing all metadata leaks, and fulfilling open science requirements with Data Availability statements. Essential for authors ensuring their manuscript meets high academic standards.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal academic venue for their software engineering work. It compares major conferences (FSE, ICSE, ASE, ISSTA) and journals, advising on contribution shape, evidence maturity, and community fit to maximize publication chances and fit the research into the correct academic community.

A comprehensive guide for revising empirical papers submitted to top-tier Software Engineering conferences (like FSE). This framework emphasizes structuring the paper around a clear SE contribution, treating research questions as contracts, backing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously arguing threats to validity, rather than merely listing them. It ensures the paper maintains maximum academic rigor and focus.

A comprehensive guide for academics on structuring and articulating the core, novel contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly in specialized fields like Game Theory and Economic Behavior. It provides a framework for crafting a single, highly impactful 'contribution sentence' and organizing the claim cascade (Headline, Why Open, Key Idea), ensuring the theoretical advance is immediately legible to specialized editors and reviewers.

This skill provides a rigorous academic review framework for determining if a research paper significantly advances the frontiers of game theory and its applications. It assesses conceptual advances, mechanism design robustness, behavioral novelty, and cross-field reach, guiding authors on whether their work meets the high standards of top-tier academic journals like GEB. Ideal for assessing high-level theoretical or empirical contributions.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It does not write the paper itself, but rather diagnoses the current stage of your research and guides you on the optimal next specialized skill to utilize. Whether you are defining your contribution, analyzing data, structuring proofs, or preparing a rebuttal letter, this guide ensures you follow the correct academic sequence from topic selection to final submission.

This guide helps researchers translate academic findings into rigorous, evidence-grounded implications for policy, governance, and practice concerning global environmental change. It stresses that implications must be specific (naming actors and levers), honest about scope and uncertainty, and directly traceable to the study's results, avoiding generic overstatements.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors on situating their manuscripts within the comparative governance, public policy, and public administration literatures. It teaches the methodology of building a strong, portable, and theoretically comparative argument, ensuring the research contribution is relevant to the international scholarly community and meets high academic standards.

This guide instructs authors on creating mandatory Data Availability Statements and building comprehensive replication materials for academic manuscripts. It covers best practices for data provenance, code management, and handling restricted data, ensuring research integrity and reproducibility.

An expert workflow router designed for academic manuscripts targeting high-level journals on public policy and state governance. It guides authors through the entire publishing lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theoretical positioning to research design, analysis, and final rebuttal. It ensures the submitted work makes a significant comparative or institutional contribution.

This comprehensive guide assists academic researchers in assessing the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Governance Studies. It outlines the journal's scope (national, local, digital governance, public policy), required theoretical depth, suitable methodologies (policy evaluation, case studies), and structural requirements. It serves as a crucial editorial checklist to prevent mis-submission and optimize the writing process for Chinese public administration and governance research.