Skill UI

This guide assists researchers in determining the best fit for their data mining research project. It compares the contribution against major conferences (ICDM, KDD, SDM, etc.) and helps decide the appropriate track (Research, Applied, Blue Sky) based on the nature of the mechanism, evidence, and intended scope for optimal academic impact.

Provides strict guidelines for writing the Related Work section in theoretical database papers. It teaches authors how to precisely position their novel results against existing theorems (ICDT/PODS canon), covering complex topics like finite model theory, query complexity, and proper academic citation etiquette, ensuring genuine novelty is highlighted.

This guide details the process of packaging artifacts for academic conferences (ICLR), ensuring that research claims are fully reproducible and reviewable. It emphasizes providing minimal reproduction paths, maintaining data provenance, rigorously anonymizing metadata to protect authors' identities, and creating robust, permanent records for the scholarly community.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors detailing how to establish and maintain rigorous reproducibility in Machine Learning research papers (e.g., ICLR). It instructs on mapping every central claim to verifiable evidence, including recording seeds, variance, specific compute budgets (training vs. inference), data preprocessing scripts, and ethical considerations. The statement must function as a public contract for the scientific community.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and polishing scholarly review articles for a broad academic audience. It ensures the writing adopts an authoritative, highly accessible, and forward-looking narrative arc, guiding the author to move beyond mere summary and establish a clear research agenda.

This guide details the advanced methodology for structuring the 'Related Work' section for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., ASPLOS). It emphasizes positioning research across multiple parallel domains—including architecture, OS/systems, compilers, and accelerators—and defining the precise technical boundary where your work advances the state of the art.

A comprehensive guide for researchers responding to 'Revise and Resubmit' (R&R) decisions, particularly in Comparative Political Studies. It provides a structured framework for drafting the response letter, ensuring every point from reviewers and editors is addressed point-by-point. Focus areas include strengthening comparative leverage, addressing rival explanations, and maintaining professional, evidence-based argumentation.

This skill acts as a workflow router for writing academic papers for the journal 'China Rural Economy'. It does not replace specialized skills but guides the user through the entire manuscript process—from topic formulation and literature review to causal identification, mechanism testing, and handling reviewer comments (R&R). It ensures the structural and methodological completeness of the research article.

This skill guides researchers through the entire end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a research paper to a journal. It structures a 12-step pipeline, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature review to experimentation, reproducibility, submission, peer review, revision, and final camera-ready versioning. It acts as a comprehensive project dashboard for managing the entire academic publishing journey.

This guide helps academics precisely define the marginal contribution of a finance research manuscript relative to the existing body of literature. It provides structured advice on how to articulate the 'delta'—the new fact or mechanism—and appropriately size the claim to match the scope of a generalist journal, avoiding pitfalls like over-claiming or mis-targeting.

A detailed guide for academic authors, outlining the specific methodological, historical, and comparative requirements for submitting scholarly work to the journal History of Religions. It emphasizes the need for cross-cultural comparison, morphological analysis, and rigorous grounding in primary sources and philology, helping authors re-frame their research fit.

This guide outlines the proper placement of various research materials—including proofs, code, and extended results—within major academic conference submissions. It helps authors understand which content must be presented in the main body, which belongs in appendices, and how to correctly manage supplementary manuscripts and code/data supplements to maximize the chance of reviewer acceptance.