Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major academic conferences (e.g., ICSE). It details the strict rules for differentiating mandatory core content (the 10-page limit) from supporting evidence, such as extended proofs, scripts, and raw data, which must be placed in an anonymized supplementary package. Learn the 'summarize-and-point' discipline to ensure verifiability and maintain reviewer trust.

This guide provides stringent rules and structural advice for authors tackling academic papers, particularly in the domain of software maintenance and evolution. It emphasizes leading with the maintenance problem, stating research questions as contractual measurements, pairing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously discussing threats to validity. Use this when revising academic submissions to ensure maximum impact and technical rigor for the field.

This comprehensive guide details the strict content partitioning rules for preparing papers for top-tier security conferences like IEEE S&P. It advises authors on differentiating between core claims (which must live in the limited body pages) and verification material (which belongs in the appendix), ensuring adherence to strict page limits and review expectations.

This guide provides crucial strategic advice for authors responding to major AI conference reviews (e.g., IJCAI/IJCAI-ECAI). It emphasizes extreme conciseness, focusing only on decision-critical corrections, factual errors, and pressing questions. The rules strictly prohibit adding new results or broad complaints, ensuring the response remains short and highly targeted.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) via ScholarOne. This guide details critical academic publishing standards, including the 25-page limit, single-blind review rules, required LaTeX formatting, and the mandatory structure for the GitHub code/data reproducibility deposit. Use this when performing the final checks before submission.

This guide outlines strict rules for structuring ACM IMC papers, teaching authors how to correctly partition content. It mandates that all decision-critical evidence—including core findings, methodology, and ethics discussion—must be self-contained within the limited-page body, preventing the misuse of the unlimited appendix space. It ensures the paper remains reviewable and coherent.

A comprehensive audit checklist for submitting papers to the INFOCOM conference. It covers critical compliance aspects, including the two-step abstract registration process, strict IEEEtran formatting rules (9-page body limit), mandatory double-blind anonymization, and adherence to author submission caps. Use this guide to ensure your manuscript meets all technical and procedural requirements before the deadline.

This guide provides structured rules for authors writing sensor-systems or information-processing papers. It emphasizes leading with the physical sensing problem, requiring real-hardware measurements for energy, latency, and ground truth, and adhering to strict academic formatting constraints. Use this when revising submissions to ensure technical depth and practical deployability.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to the IROS conference. It details critical formatting rules, including page limits (references counted in), double-anonymous requirements, video specifications (60s/10MB), and procedural traps (PIN collection, compliance testing). Essential for ensuring submission acceptance in major robotics venues.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscripts to the INFORMS portal. It verifies compliance with strict formatting guidelines, double-anonymization rules, mandatory contribution statements, and required reviewer/editor nominations, ensuring the manuscript is submission-ready.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for polishing scientific manuscripts to meet the rigorous standards of the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It focuses on refining language, ensuring structural clarity, standardizing nomenclature and units, and enforcing 'Claim Discipline' by replacing vague boosters (e.g., 'novel,' 'dramatically improved') with concrete data and quantitative evidence. Ideal for authors whose data is solid but whose prose requires academic refinement.

This guide outlines the mandatory data and code deposit policy for articles published in the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE). Authors must submit a complete, non-confidential set of input data (plain ASCII/CSV), programs that replicate every result, and a detailed README file. It emphasizes strict adherence to archival format rules, ensuring the research is fully reproducible for the academic community.