Skill UI

Provides rigorous guidelines for conducting robust, verifiable, and reproducible evaluations in networking research. It emphasizes moving beyond simple simulations by demanding the use of real target platforms, documenting full system provenance (traces and configs), establishing honestly tuned baselines, and reporting detailed measurement statistics and uncertainty. Essential for authors aiming for top-tier conference submissions.

A comprehensive guide for positioning Natural Language Processing (NLP) research papers for the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). It helps authors optimize their manuscripts by focusing on conference fit, structuring evidence, identifying necessary baselines, and adapting the narrative for a selective CS conference audience. Essential for submission strategy and manuscript re-framing.

This skill guides authors on how to position, structure, and strengthen empirical Natural Language Processing (NLP) manuscripts for submission to the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). It provides deep insights into conference fit, required evidence (baselines, error analysis, datasets), proper framing, and anticipating reviewer expectations for top-tier AI venues.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and presenting rigorous, high-impact experimental chapters suitable for top-tier computer science journals. Learn to design experiments driven by Research Questions (RQ), select fair baselines, conduct statistical significance testing, and implement ablation/sensitivity analyses. Ensures evidence is reproducible and perfectly aligns with abstract claims.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the empirical evidence section of top-tier NLP conference papers (e.g., EACL). It mandates rigorous controls, including fair baselines (tuned models, explicit LLM prompts), statistical significance testing (variance, CI), contamination checks, and detailed human evaluation protocols. Use this to elevate your research from mere assertion to scientifically audited proof.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers on how to structure and support claims in AI papers, particularly for top-tier conferences like ECAI. It details how to match the type of claim (e.g., completeness, efficiency, generalization) to the appropriate evidence—whether it requires a formal proof, a controlled empirical comparison, or a real-world deployment demonstration. The guide covers best practices for ML (seeds, ablations, baselines), multi-agent systems, and ensuring full provenance and academic honesty.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for designing, auditing, and reporting empirical evaluations in database systems research. It emphasizes the principle that evidence must proportionally match the claim, requiring the use of real-world workloads, fair and tuned baselines, thorough measurement of variance and state (warm/cold), and fully reproducible evaluation harnesses. It also outlines the higher bar for 'Experiments & Analysis' papers.

This comprehensive guide assists authors in strategically positioning their computer vision manuscripts for the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). It covers conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing, required evidence (e.g., ablations, baselines, failure modes), and structural advice to ensure the work aligns with ECCV's scope and current review policies. Use this tool for venue selection and submission preparation.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting Information Retrieval (IR) manuscripts to the European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR). It assists in strategically positioning the work by defining scope fit, structuring the evidence (e.g., baselines, error analysis), aligning with the rigorous standards of the European IR community, and guiding the differentiation of the contribution against similar top-tier venues like SIGIR or CIKM. Essential tool for pre-submission refinement.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for designing and auditing empirical studies in software engineering (SE). It emphasizes that evidence must proportionally match the claims made, covering topics like using real subject systems, establishing fair baselines, calculating SE-standard statistics (effect sizes, CIs), and ensuring thorough provenance, especially for LLM-based work. It helps researchers strengthen their research methodology before publication.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing empirical experiments in signal processing, audio, and speech domains. It emphasizes matching standard metrics (e.g., WER, SI-SDR, PSNR) to specific tasks, establishing current strong baselines, and systematically sweeping operating conditions (like SNR or reverberation time) to ensure robust, reliable, and publication-ready results.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to IEEE ICDE peer reviews. Learn how to structure both rebuttals to initial concerns and detailed revise-and-resubmit change documents. The guide emphasizes strategic triage, anchoring answers to concrete evidence, addressing systems-level pushback (e.g., baselines, cost), and maintaining feasibility discipline within tight revision deadlines.