Skill UI

This skill generates a comprehensive, minimal, and enforceable security policy document (Blue Book) for applications handling sensitive data. It structures requirements using MUST/SHOULD/CAN language, explicitly defining assumptions, scope, threat models, and security gates. It is essential for establishing clear security guardrails and ensuring compliance early in the development lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide to navigating the intensive, multi-round post-acceptance editing cycle for academic journals. It outlines the distinct stages—from substantive argument strengthening to technical line edits and final Bluebook proofing—ensuring submissions stay on track through the required rounds and into print.

This skill audits the accuracy and academic rigor of legal citations, particularly for law review articles following The Bluebook style. It ensures proper authority hierarchy (primary vs. secondary), correct use of pinpoint citations, and proper signal usage (e.g., See, Cf., But see). It is essential for academic legal writing to ensure submissions meet the highest standards of scholarly rigor.

This comprehensive guide walks authors through the rigorous, post-acceptance editing process typical of top-tier scholarly journals, such as Harvard Law Review. It covers key stages: defending substantive arguments, enforcing technical style (Bluebook), and performing the critical source-pull/cite-check, ensuring every citation is verifiable. It focuses on collaborative relationship management and timely execution.

Run the final pre-submission preflight for submitting a manuscript to the Harvard Law Review (HLR) via its own electronic submission system. Covers manuscript readiness, anonymization, length limits, Bluebook 22nd-edition footnotes, expedite setup, and season timing. Ensures the manuscript is near-final, properly anonymized, and within word limits before upload.

This guide acts as the orchestrator for submitting scholarly articles to Harvard Law Review (HLR). It maps the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of legal academic writing, guiding users through every step from initial topic selection and preemption checks to argument structure, rigorous Bluebook citation, and final student-editor review. It is essential for understanding the unique, student-edited model and required submission strategy in legal academia.

This skill performs a rigorous audit of legal journal footnotes, verifying the existence, pinpoint accuracy, Bluebook formatting, and direct textual support for every citation. It is essential for manuscript preparation, particularly before a source-pull audit, ensuring the piece survives scholarly review without citation errors or integrity issues.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for constructing academically rigorous legal citations, adhering strictly to The Bluebook format and specific journal requirements. It emphasizes the necessity of pinpoint citations, ensuring every law or fact assertion is supported by an authoritative source. Essential for law students, legal scholars, and researchers drafting highly accurate scholarly articles.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to academic law journals, specifically tailored for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides users through critical pre-upload steps, including mandatory anonymization checks, adhering to strict length caps (Article, Essay, Forum), verifying Bluebook citation apparatus, and ensuring the use of the official submission portal. This tool helps prevent common submission failures before the final upload.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for contributors to The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides the user through the entire submission lifecycle, from initial topic selection and thesis development to Bluebook citation checking and final placement strategy. It emphasizes that submissions must be near-final, highly structured, and fully footnoted, directing the user to the appropriate skill path based on the article's track (Article, Note, Feature, etc.) and current stage.

A rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers, and other legal scholarship. It runs six specialized passes covering structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar, fact-checking, and synthesis, delivering a prioritized editorial memo. Handles articles of any length via intelligent chunking and reads .docx directly.

This skill generates a minimal yet enforceable security policy document for applications handling sensitive data. It creates a coherent Blue Book using MUST/SHOULD/CAN language, defining explicit assumptions, scope, and security gates. It helps establish threat models, data classification, trust boundaries, and incident response guidelines tailored to specific operational security defaults.