Skill UI

A comprehensive style guide for polishing academic manuscripts intended for the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It guides authors on structuring the introduction to immediately highlight the IS-management contribution, crafting a concise, citation-free abstract (under 150 words), maintaining the visibility of both the IT artifact and managerial implications, and adhering to numbered citation styles.

This skill guides authors on structuring the contribution of their marketing research manuscript, particularly for submission to the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It emphasizes meeting JMR's dual requirement: clearly stating both the novel substantive/theoretical insight and the methodological credibility/advance. It provides genre-specific advice for behavioral, econometric, and methods papers to ensure the argument is rigorous and impactful.

This guide helps researchers evaluate if a marketing topic meets the high academic standards of top journals like the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It provides a dual-bar test, requiring both methodological rigor (e.g., causal identification, experimental design) and substantive contribution (new insights). It also helps distinguish the appropriate venue among major marketing journals (JM, MS, JCR).

This guide provides comprehensive standards for defending rigorous data analysis in academic submissions, particularly for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It details specific requirements for both quantitative work (e.g., robustness checks, SEM, endogeneity) and qualitative work (e.g., coding transparency, abductive logic, trustworthiness), ensuring the analysis credibly supports the theoretical claims.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in structuring rigorous and contribution-worthy academic theories suitable for top-tier journals. It meticulously details both the deductive path (building hypotheses through explicit mechanisms) and the inductive path (creating auditable, grounded models from qualitative data). It teaches how to move beyond mere description to establish profound theoretical insights and address rival explanations.

This router guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage process of drafting and refining a manuscript for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It diagnoses bottlenecks, providing a comprehensive, sequential path from topic selection and theoretical development to methods, data analysis, writing, and revision/rebuttal, ensuring the work meets high academic publishing standards.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript targeting the Journal of Econometrics (JoE). It diagnoses the current bottleneck—from initial idea generation and methodological positioning to data analysis, writing, and final submission/rebuttal—and recommends the precise specialized skill to invoke next, ensuring the work meets the high standards of econometric theory and evidence.

This router guides authors through the entire process of preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE). It does not replace specialized skills but serves as a diagnostic tool, telling the user which specific jole-* skill to invoke next based on the current writing bottleneck, from initial topic selection through to rebuttal and final submission.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for submitting empirical research to the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It guides researchers through every stage of the manuscript lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theory development to rigorous data analysis, contribution framing, and point-by-point rebuttal. It does not replace specialized skills but diagnoses the current bottleneck and suggests the appropriate next step in the submission process.

Provides a comprehensive guide for drafting a robust "Revise and Resubmit" rebuttal letter, especially for cross-disciplinary journals. It teaches authors how to simultaneously satisfy both methodology (identification) and policy relevance reviewers, protecting the core findings while addressing every comment point-by-point with evidence and reasoned arguments.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for evaluating whether a research question is suitable for high-impact policy journals (like JPAM). It trains users to structure ideas by confirming three critical elements: establishing a specific, policy-relevant intervention (the policy), identifying the decision-maker and the counterfactual choice (the decision), and confirming a credible, causal design (exogenous variation). It ensures the research has both empirical rigor and real-world policy stake.

Provides comprehensive methodological guidelines for designing rigorous studies in public policy and marketing. The framework covers both prospective (e.g., realistic experiments) and retrospective (e.g., DiD, RDD) evaluation designs, emphasizing the necessity of establishing a strong counterfactual basis and ensuring policy relevance in data collection and analysis.