Skill UI

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in structuring rigorous and contribution-worthy academic theories suitable for top-tier journals. It meticulously details both the deductive path (building hypotheses through explicit mechanisms) and the inductive path (creating auditable, grounded models from qualitative data). It teaches how to move beyond mere description to establish profound theoretical insights and address rival explanations.

This router guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage process of drafting and refining a manuscript for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It diagnoses bottlenecks, providing a comprehensive, sequential path from topic selection and theoretical development to methods, data analysis, writing, and revision/rebuttal, ensuring the work meets high academic publishing standards.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript targeting the Journal of Econometrics (JoE). It diagnoses the current bottleneck—from initial idea generation and methodological positioning to data analysis, writing, and final submission/rebuttal—and recommends the precise specialized skill to invoke next, ensuring the work meets the high standards of econometric theory and evidence.

This router guides authors through the entire process of preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE). It does not replace specialized skills but serves as a diagnostic tool, telling the user which specific jole-* skill to invoke next based on the current writing bottleneck, from initial topic selection through to rebuttal and final submission.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for submitting empirical research to the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It guides researchers through every stage of the manuscript lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theory development to rigorous data analysis, contribution framing, and point-by-point rebuttal. It does not replace specialized skills but diagnoses the current bottleneck and suggests the appropriate next step in the submission process.

Provides a comprehensive guide for drafting a robust "Revise and Resubmit" rebuttal letter, especially for cross-disciplinary journals. It teaches authors how to simultaneously satisfy both methodology (identification) and policy relevance reviewers, protecting the core findings while addressing every comment point-by-point with evidence and reasoned arguments.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for evaluating whether a research question is suitable for high-impact policy journals (like JPAM). It trains users to structure ideas by confirming three critical elements: establishing a specific, policy-relevant intervention (the policy), identifying the decision-maker and the counterfactual choice (the decision), and confirming a credible, causal design (exogenous variation). It ensures the research has both empirical rigor and real-world policy stake.

Provides comprehensive methodological guidelines for designing rigorous studies in public policy and marketing. The framework covers both prospective (e.g., realistic experiments) and retrospective (e.g., DiD, RDD) evaluation designs, emphasizing the necessity of establishing a strong counterfactual basis and ensuring policy relevance in data collection and analysis.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major revisions in academic journals, particularly in policy and marketing research. It teaches how to systematically convert vague reviewer demands (e.g., "improve contribution") into concrete, visible analytical work, ensuring the response is both methodologically rigorous and policy-relevant.

A specialized guide for refining scholarly manuscripts intended for public policy and marketing journals. It teaches how to structure the introduction around the concrete policy problem, write an actionable 200-word abstract, and maintain a tone of evidence rather than advocacy. The goal is to ensure the prose is clear and highly readable for both academic experts and non-technical policy practitioners.

This router guides authors through the entire academic manuscript lifecycle for submissions to the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE). It diagnoses structural bottlenecks and ensures that the research meets all critical gates, starting from initial topic selection and contribution framing, through rigorous data analysis, figure design, drafting, and finally preparing for submission and rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for assembling a fully transparent and reproducible research package required for academic submissions (e.g., JRU/Springer). It structures the necessary components—including full experimental instructions, source code (z-Tree/Qualtrics), estimation scripts, and de-identified data—to allow any external party to replicate the study's findings end-to-end. Focuses on both procedural reproducibility and structural econometrics re-runnability.