Skill UI

This skill detects AI-generated deepfake audio used in voice phishing (vishing) attacks. It functions by extracting critical spectral features (including MFCCs, spectral centroid, and zero-crossing rate) and passing them through advanced machine learning models (like Random Forest and Gradient Boosting). The system supports batch forensic analysis, provides confidence scores, and generates detailed reports to verify the authenticity of recorded voice calls, making it essential for cybersecurity incident response and fraud investigation.

A comprehensive tool for authors targeting the ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS). It provides expert guidance on assessing whether a computer and communications security manuscript is a strong fit for this specific, high-impact venue. Topics covered include conference fit assessment, evidence bar establishment, manuscript re-framing strategies, threat modeling, and proper community positioning for maximum review impact.

This comprehensive guide helps authors strategically position their computer security manuscripts for the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS). It details topic fit, required threat modeling, evidence presentation, and critical comparisons with sister venues (e.g., S&P, USENIX Security). It serves as a high-level 'fit/framing' tool for maximizing submission success in core areas like privacy, cryptography, and systems security.

This comprehensive guide details the essential steps required to transition an accepted, anonymous conference paper into the final, public 'camera-ready' version for major academic publications like ACM MM. It covers de-anonymization, completing ACM eRights forms, incorporating CCS concepts, releasing permanent code/data artifacts, and preparing for the final presentation.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal response for major academic conferences (like CCS). It teaches strategic communication, focusing on triaging decision-critical issues (threat model, ethics, novelty), structuring arguments by conceding strong points, anchoring claims to existing evidence, and avoiding over-promising. Essential for authors facing adversarial review patterns.

This guide details the comprehensive workflow for preparing an accepted ACM CCS paper for the final proceedings. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization, applying ACM sigconf templates and rights forms, incorporating shepherd/minor-revision feedback, placing artifact evaluation badges, and coordinating publication disclosure timing. Adherence to these technical and policy checks ensures compliance with ACM standards.

A comprehensive guide for designing, auditing, and reporting security experiments for top-tier conferences like ACM CCS. It emphasizes moving beyond simple benchmarks by mapping every security claim to undeniable evidence, including exploit runs on named targets, overhead measurements, and evaluation against adaptive attackers. Used for rigorous academic research defense.

This guide details how to audit and position security research submissions for premier academic venues like CCS, S&P, USENIX, and NDSS. It teaches authors to structure their 'Related Work' section by comparing their novelty against the 'security big four,' specialist literature, and real-world practitioner records (such as CVEs and vendor advisories). The goal is to clearly articulate the technical delta and eligibility for publication.

A comprehensive guide for researchers detailing how to strengthen the reproducibility of security claims for top conferences like CCS. It covers mapping every security claim (attacks, defenses, measurements) to verifiable evidence, managing artifact availability when sharing is restricted, and defining the achievable degree of reproduction (Turnkey, Scripted, Descriptive). This ensures academic rigor and transparency in published security work.

A comprehensive guide for authors planning research submissions to top-tier academic security conferences like CCS. It details the two-cycle HotCRP workflow, decision criteria, and strategic advice on addressing threat model soundness, novelty, evidence quality, and crucial ethical disclosure concerns across all stages, from initial review to minor revision.

A comprehensive checklist and audit guide for submitting papers to ACM CCS. This resource covers mandatory requirements such as abstract registration deadlines, adherence to the strict two-column sigconf template, rigorous anonymization protocols, dedicated ethics sections, and avoiding desk-reject triggers. Essential for authors preparing for top-tier security conferences.