Skill UI

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for writing Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire publishing lifecycle—from initial scope assessment to final submission and revision. It helps diagnose bottlenecks related to scientific advance, characterization strength, figure quality, and adherence to journal format, ensuring the manuscript is robust and ready for publication.

A guide for authors needing to precisely position their theoretical contribution against existing literature. It teaches how to identify the 'delta'—the exact difference (e.g., weaker assumption, new environment, full characterization)—relative to the single closest academic result, rather than making vague claims about the field as a whole.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Biomaterials journal. It emphasizes the journal's core requirement: dual rigor. A successful submission must integrate thorough materials design and characterization with genuine biological evaluation (in vitro/in vivo), crucially establishing a mechanistic link between material properties and biological outcomes. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and pre-submission self-assessment against high academic standards.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their research on cementitious materials—covering hydration, microstructure, and durability—is sufficiently mechanistic for top-tier journals. It emphasizes shifting the narrative from simple mix-design performance reporting to establishing fundamental chemical, microstructural, or degradation mechanisms, supported by rigorous, quantitative characterization.

This guide provides rigorous criteria for authors targeting top-tier journals in electrochemical energy storage. It emphasizes that successful submissions must move beyond simple synthesis-plus-capacity reports, instead focusing on robust structure–property–mechanism relationships, supported by advanced operando/in-situ characterization and detailed scientific evidence.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference venue (e.g., HPCA, ISCA, MICRO, ASPLOS) for their microarchitecture or systems research paper. It outlines key criteria, such as whether the contribution is a measured microarchitectural cost, a buildable mechanism, or a measurable characterization, and how to strategically route the project based on its novelty and evidence.

A comprehensive guide for authors to determine the optimal conference venue for their speech-related research. It utilizes a 'modality test' to assess whether a contribution relies on audio signal characteristics (acoustics, prosody, etc.) or merely text transcriptions. The guide helps authors choose between major venues like INTERSPEECH, ACL, ICASSP, and specialized workshops, ensuring the claim is reviewed by relevant experts.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for auditing experimental rigor in chemical manuscripts, particularly for high-impact journals like JACS. It covers necessary characterization data for new compounds, including NMR, HRMS, elemental analysis, and stereochemistry, and ensures mechanisms and catalytic claims are fully supported by appropriate controls and data.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier chemistry journals like JACS. This skill helps authors pre-empt reviewer objections, select appropriate suggested and excluded experts, and rigorously stress-test the manuscript's scope, characterization, and mechanistic claims before formal submission. It transforms the writing process into a defensible, high-quality academic product.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assemble and audit the Supporting Information (SI) for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript. It ensures every reported chemical result and structure is fully reproducible by an independent chemist, covering detailed procedures, full characterization data (NMR, HRMS, IR), stereochemistry, and crystallographic details (CIF/CCDC).

A comprehensive guide and checklist for ensuring that figures and tables in medical manuscripts comply with the rigorous reporting standards of JAMA. It covers mandatory elements such as CONSORT flow diagrams, reporting effect sizes with 95% CIs, structuring baseline characteristics, and avoiding statistical misrepresentation (e.g., using p-values instead of CIs).

This guide teaches academics how to write the 'related work' section for high-level theoretical journals. It emphasizes positioning a new result relative to the closest existing theorem, rather than giving a broad survey. Users learn to identify and articulate the precise 'delta'—whether it's weakening assumptions, achieving greater generality, introducing a new object, or providing a tighter/constructive characterization.