Skill UI

A comprehensive workflow designed for clinical professionals to search, retrieve, and synthesize medical evidence. It allows users to query clinical literature with specialized filters (e.g., specialty, evidence level), check potential drug interactions against patient profiles, and look up the latest specialty guidelines from major health organizations (like ACC/AHA, NICE). The output provides structured citations, confidence scores, and evidence grading to support informed clinical decision-making.

This module provides minimal working examples for the OpenEvidence API, designed for clinical intelligence applications. Users can perform complex clinical queries to get treatment recommendations, check potential drug interactions based on patient context, and search for authoritative medical guidelines from major health organizations (e.g., ACC/AHA). Ideal for developing evidence-based healthcare decision support systems.

This SDK provides comprehensive, production-ready patterns for interacting with the OpenEvidence clinical evidence API. It enables developers to efficiently query medical literature, retrieve clinical guidelines, and generate evidence-based recommendations. Key features include a singleton client for consistent authentication, robust error wrappers (handling retries, invalid keys), and structured data models designed to ensure audit compliance and detailed citation provenance in complex healthcare applications.

Provide REST API access to ClinPGx, the successor to PharmGKB, for querying gene-drug interactions, CPIC/DPWG/FDA guidelines, allele functions, and evidence that supports precision dosing and pharmacogenomics-driven clinical decisions.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for adapting research manuscripts for the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (AJRCCM). It assesses a study's scientific fit across the spectrum of basic science, translational research, and clinical trials. It ensures adherence to rigorous reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE, ARRIVE) and the journal's specific house style, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness.

This skill guides authors through evaluating the suitability of their clinical research manuscript for Annals of Internal Medicine. It provides deep insights into the journal's high standards, including specific methodological requirements (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD, TRIPOD), required evidence synthesis depth, ideal scope (RCTs, systematic reviews, guidelines), and current house style guidelines necessary for successful submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors assessing the suitability of their clinical or translational oncology studies for Annals of Oncology (ESMO). It covers the journal's high standards for rigorous, practice-changing research, including requirements for robust trial design, biomarker validation, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), and alignment with ESMO best practices. This is a venue-fit aid, not medical or regulatory advice.

This skill serves as an essential venue-selection and framing aid for researchers targeting Arthritis & Rheumatology (A&R). It guides authors on the scope, required evidence bar, and structural standards for publishing research on autoimmune and musculoskeletal diseases (e.g., RA, SLE, OA). It covers guidelines for clinical trials, observational studies, and basic/translational immunology, including mandatory reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE) and house style requirements.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting Blood, the flagship journal of the American Society of Hematology (ASH). This skill details the journal's scope, required mechanistic depth, evidence standards, structure, and submission checklist. It helps authors re-frame their research to meet the high bar for clinical relevance and fundamental biology in hematology, ensuring adherence to ASH guidelines.

This guide helps researchers determine if their study—particularly in clinical neurology or translational neuroscience—meets the high standards of leading journals like Brain. It provides detailed insights into required mechanistic depth, evidence types (e.g., genetics, biomarkers), appropriate reporting guidelines (STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA), and common desk-reject expectations. It is a venue-fit aid, detailing the scientific rigor needed for submission.

This skill guides authors on assessing if their cardiovascular manuscript meets the rigorous standards of Circulation, the AHA's flagship journal. It covers the journal's specific scope, ideal research methods (e.g., RCTs, biomarker studies, epidemiology), structural requirements, and how to effectively frame the work to impact AHA guidelines and clinical practice.

This resource provides a comprehensive fit-check and framing guide for submitting research to Critical Care Medicine, the flagship journal of SCCM. It outlines the high academic and clinical bar required for studies on the critically ill, covering necessary focus on clinically important advances, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and rigorous methodological expectations for ICU-related research.