Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.

This guide provides essential structural advice for authors writing high-impact research papers for top-tier AI conferences. It covers the 'first-page arc,' ensuring the contribution is generalizable (not model-specific), matching evidence types (proofs vs. empirical data) to claims, and maintaining narrative density over a limited page count. Perfect for researchers preparing submissions.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and compressing academic manuscripts, focusing on strict formatting constraints (e.g., LNCS single-column, 14-page limit) typical of major conferences like ECCV. Learn how to structure your paper, optimize the first page for non-specialists, and phrase claims to withstand rigorous peer review and rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier database conferences (like EDBT). It teaches how to audit the novelty and eligibility of a research paper by writing a 'delta-first' contrast against related work, rather than simply listing citations. Covers positioning contributions relative to flagship venues, theory literature, and managing resubmission rules.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers audit their papers before submission to the EDBT conference. It covers critical steps including selecting the correct submission cycle and paper shape (Regular, Vision, Experiments & Analysis), adhering to strict formatting standards, managing the 12-month resubmission ban, ensuring double-blind compliance, and providing verifiable, reproducible artifacts. It is essential for academic publishing compliance.

This guide provides stringent best practices for authors submitting papers to top database systems conferences (like EDBT). It emphasizes leading with a concrete data-management contribution, ensuring mechanisms are reproducible in prose, and pairing every claim with rigorous, real-world evidence. It also dictates how to manage scope and adhere to publishing constraints.

A comprehensive project management guide for preparing and submitting advanced NLP conference papers to EMNLP. It details the entire research lifecycle, including backward planning from ARR deadlines, managing data annotation timelines, coordinating team roles, and making strategic decisions (commit, revise, withdraw) to ensure successful submission.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors submitting NLP and Computational Linguistics papers to EACL. It covers conference positioning, manuscript re-framing from journal or arXiv styles, and establishes rigorous evidence standards. It helps authors ensure their work aligns with the European ACL community focus, optimizing the paper's narrative structure for high acceptance rates.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting systems papers to the EuroSys conference. It helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript, frame the narrative, and determine the required evidence depth (including implementation artifacts and realistic workloads). The guide specifically covers European systems research in OS, distributed systems, cloud, and security, while providing comparisons to related top-tier venues like SOSP and OSDI.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and submit highly technical papers to major academic conferences (e.g., EuroSys). It outlines the 'four shelves'—the 12-page core argument, references, artifact repositories, and appendices—ensuring that the main, decision-critical evidence is always contained within the primary reviewed pages, preventing the submission from failing due to overflow.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising top-tier systems papers, specifically for conferences like EuroSys. It details the required academic structure, including building the problem-to-mechanism arc, managing the 12-page technical budget, writing rigorous evaluation sections (including measuring failure cases), and maintaining the necessary double-blind academic voice.