Skill UI

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting academic papers to the FAccT conference. It details critical, multi-step processes, including the mandatory abstract registration gate, maintaining mutual anonymity, adhering to strict ACM formatting rules, and including required endmatter statements (such as the Generative AI Usage Statement).

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting interdisciplinary, responsible AI papers to major academic conferences like FAccT. It provides a detailed backward-planning timeline, covering milestones from initial abstract registration and literature review to revisions, camera-ready submission, and conference presentation, emphasizing ethical considerations and structured academic processes.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting storage-related research to top-tier conferences (e.g., USENIX FAST). It dictates how to structure the paper, emphasizing leading with the specific storage cost addressed (e.g., write amplification, tail latency, endurance) and grounding all claims in proportional, real-device evidence rather than generic performance statements. Essential for ensuring technical rigor and reviewer trust.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for creating durable, verifiable evidence objects (artifacts) for theoretical computer science papers. It details best practices for managing proofs, certificates, checker code, and version histories across different publication formats (arXiv, IEEE Xplore) to ensure long-term academic credibility and reproducibility.

A comprehensive audit checklist and guide for authors submitting academic papers to top-tier conferences like FOCS. It covers critical aspects including formatting standards (11pt, single-column), metadata integrity (double-blind checks), technical pre-flight checks (unencrypted PDF, no author leakage), and adherence to complex publication policies (IEEE/SIGACT). Essential for ensuring submission readiness.

A comprehensive guide detailing the best practices for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers, specifically tailored for top-tier conferences like FOCS. It emphasizes front-loading key results within the first ten pages, pairing informal statements with formal theorems, and calibrating prose for a broad, non-specialist committee.

A comprehensive guide on structuring empirical research papers for top-tier conferences, such as FSE. It outlines strict partitioning rules, ensuring that all decision-critical evidence, core arguments, and key findings reside within the primary reviewed body, while supplementary artifacts and appendices provide necessary, but non-judgmental, support. Covers page budget discipline, double-anonymity requirements, and optimizing the paper's flow.

A comprehensive guide for revising empirical papers submitted to top-tier Software Engineering conferences (like FSE). This framework emphasizes structuring the paper around a clear SE contribution, treating research questions as contracts, backing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously arguing threats to validity, rather than merely listing them. It ensures the paper maintains maximum academic rigor and focus.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to technical reviews and revising conference papers during a limited, combined rebuttal window. It teaches how to strategically triage objections, run decisive experiments, craft arguments for a program committee champion, and ensure minimal, faithful revisions to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference venue (e.g., HPCA, ISCA, MICRO, ASPLOS) for their microarchitecture or systems research paper. It outlines key criteria, such as whether the contribution is a measured microarchitectural cost, a buildable mechanism, or a measurable characterization, and how to strategically route the project based on its novelty and evidence.

This is a comprehensive audit checklist for submitting full-length research papers to the HRI conference. It guides authors through critical submission mechanics, including adhering to two-step deadlines (abstract then paper), selecting the correct technical track, managing formatting (8 pages, ACM template), ensuring double-blind anonymity across PDF, video, and data, and meeting human-participants ethics standards before final submission.

A comprehensive guide for structuring Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) conference submissions. It outlines the critical distinction between core, decision-making content (which must remain in the 8-page body) and supplementary materials (e.g., extended tables, instruments, codebooks). Special emphasis is placed on treating the video figure as a primary artifact, ensuring it is short, legible, and properly anonymized for double-blind review.