Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submissions to the TACAS conference. It meticulously details the entire academic publishing lifecycle, from initial category selection and evidence locking to mandatory tool artifact submission, rebuttal, and camera-ready preparation. It is tailored for understanding the unique single annual review cycle and parallel tool/paper review structure.

This skill guides authors on positioning information retrieval (IR) work for the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). It functions as a venue-selection and manuscript re-framing tool, ensuring the submission aligns with TREC's focus on shared evaluation tracks, test collections, and NIST-style benchmarking. It helps authors structure evidence, understand reviewer expectations, and distinguish the work from general CS conference submissions.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference (UAI, AISTATS, NeurIPS, ICML, etc.) for their work, particularly when the core contribution revolves around uncertainty representation, probabilistic reasoning, or causal inference. It provides detailed filters and comparison points to refine the paper's scope and target audience.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.

A comprehensive guide for researchers determining if their Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) project contribution is an 'interface artifact' suitable for UIST, or if it belongs to a different venue like CHI or CSCW. It employs the 'artifact-subtraction test' to distinguish between technical system novelty and empirical user findings, ensuring proper conference submission routing.

This detailed guide helps researchers determine the optimal top-tier venue (e.g., USENIX Security, IEEE S&P, ACM CCS) for their security research paper. It emphasizes that venue selection must be based on the committee's core expertise and the existence of reusable artifacts, measurements, or systems evidence, ensuring the work has the necessary technical depth to succeed.

This guide helps researchers determine if their project qualifies as a visualization contribution (beyond general HCI or ML). It provides structured criteria for choosing the best conference venue (e.g., IEEE VIS, EuroVis, CHI) and mapping the work to one of the six core visualization areas based on contribution type and evidence maturity.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers, specifically tailored for the IEEE VIS conference cycle. It maps out all critical milestones, from initial area selection and abstract submission through to conditional acceptance revisions and final camera-ready preparation. Use this skill to responsibly plan for the annual cycle, manage reviewers' expectations, and mitigate common submission risks.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors submitting research papers to PVLDB (Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment). This resource details critical steps, including adherence to multiple deadlines (abstract, full paper), category budget selection, single-blind formatting rules, and author co-contribution caps, ensuring submissions avoid desk rejection.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers determine if their project qualifies as a core data-management primitive, which specific PVLDB category (Regular, EA&B, Scalable Data Science, Vision) it belongs to, and whether a major data conference like VLDB or SIGMOD is the optimal submission venue. It provides a rigorous primitive test and detailed routing advice for top-tier data systems research.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal venue for their Computer Vision paper, specifically addressing the unique identity of WACV (Applications-first) versus major conferences like CVPR, ICCV, and ECCV. It guides authors on whether their contribution is driven by real-world applications/constraints or by advancing core algorithms, and how to choose between the Applications or Algorithms track within WACV.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to major Web Conferences (WWW). It details critical, irreversible steps such as author list freezing, restrictive page arithmetic (12 pages total), track selection protocols, anonymity checks, and managing submission caps. Essential reading for research teams preparing for demanding academic deadlines.