Skill UI

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

This tool guides authors on structuring manuscripts for IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (TAP). It emphasizes that the core contribution must be in applied electromagnetics, antenna design, or wave propagation theory, requiring a standard evidence chain: sound theory, full-wave simulation, and measured prototype validation. Use it for venue selection and content re-framing.

This comprehensive guide details the strict content partitioning rules for preparing papers for top-tier security conferences like IEEE S&P. It advises authors on differentiating between core claims (which must live in the limited body pages) and verification material (which belongs in the appendix), ensuring adherence to strict page limits and review expectations.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing academic manuscripts aimed at the International Economic Review (IER). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current bottleneck in the writing process. It guides the user through the entire rigorous workflow—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical identification, robustness checks, and submission readiness—ensuring the paper is structured for maximum academic impact.

This guide provides a crucial late-stage polish for economic manuscripts targeting rigorous, broad-audience journals like the International Economic Review (IER). It focuses on elevating prose, structuring the introduction (four-move approach), and ensuring formal precision while maintaining cross-field legibility. Use this when your content is strong, but the narrative structure or academic writing voice needs sharpening to successfully communicate complex results to diverse referees.

This guide outlines strict rules for structuring ACM IMC papers, teaching authors how to correctly partition content. It mandates that all decision-critical evidence—including core findings, methodology, and ethics discussion—must be self-contained within the limited-page body, preventing the misuse of the unlimited appendix space. It ensures the paper remains reviewable and coherent.

A comprehensive guide for authors positioning robotics research papers for top-tier conferences like ISRR. It helps assess scope fit, define the required evidence bar, re-frame content from journal/arXiv styles, and strategically compare the manuscript against similar venues (e.g., CoRL, ICRA). Ideal for optimizing conference submission strategy in embodied intelligence and foundational robotics.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing camera-ready papers for the INTERSPEECH conference. It covers critical steps like de-anonymizing content, ensuring accurate metadata linking (DOI/ISCA Archive), meeting author registration requirements for proceedings inclusion, and planning oral or poster presentations.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to package and present supplementary evidence for INTERSPEECH submissions. It clarifies the difference between core reviewed content and optional accompaniment (audio demos, extended analyses), emphasizing that the main paper must stand alone. Learn best practices for audio curation, layout, and navigating the 'three shelves' structure to maximize impact during the review process.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting technical research papers, clarifying how to split content between the main 18-page body and supplementary artifacts. It stresses that all decision-critical evidence, such as threat models and core results, must reside within the reviewed body to ensure reviewers can adequately evaluate the work without relying on accessing supplemental materials.

This guide clarifies what constitutes an 'artifact' for pure-theory venues like ITCS. It emphasizes that the core deliverable is not code or functional components, but the mathematical argument itself. Successful evaluation relies on providing complete, self-contained proofs within the submitted PDF, along with citing dependencies precisely. It details how to handle minor computational content to ensure static, verifiable checks.

This guide details the crucial rules for structuring a scientific paper submitted to conferences like ITCS. It dictates how content—including main theorems, proofs, and motivation—must be distributed across three locations: the main body, the submitted appendix, and the external full version (arXiv). The core principle ensures that all decision-critical evidence for accepting the paper resides within the submitted PDF, preventing reviewers from relying on external or unread preprints.