Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for polishing Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscripts. It teaches authors how to structure content to appeal equally to academic scholars and reflective public practitioners. Focus areas include establishing the 'Evidence for Practice' bridge, tightening prose, adhering to strict formatting (APA, word count), and ensuring the core argument remains clear and actionable for both audiences.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals like Science. It doesn't write the content but guides the user through essential stages—from initial significance testing to final submission and rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill needed, ensuring the manuscript meets high standards for general interest and structure.

This guide outlines the critical, irreversible steps for preparing a camera-ready version of a submitted academic paper for a major conference. It covers de-anonymizing the content, securing ACM rights and metadata, correctly integrating artifact badges and reproducibility details, and structuring the final presentation talk for a merged expert audience.

This guide outlines best practices for organizing technical conference papers, specifically tailored for venues like ACM SIGCOMM. It details how to separate core arguments (Body), supporting data (Appendices), and citations (References), ensuring the main paper remains self-contained and persuasive to reviewers. Learn how to manage content load, handle extended proofs, and adhere to strict page limits without losing critical information.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to manage the division of content between the core 7-page paper body and the supplemental materials package for SIGGRAPH submissions. It emphasizes treating the results video as primary evidence, providing best practices for video creation, comparison galleries, and organizing additional technical evidence (code, data, proofs).

This guide details the critical 'triage protocol' for structuring academic papers for highly constrained venues like SIGIR. It outlines the three-container model (Paper Body, References, Repository) and provides expert advice on prioritizing review-critical evidence, implementing effective content compression techniques, and managing external repository material to ensure submissions meet strict page budgets without sacrificing soundness or review quality. Essential reading for researchers.

Provides strict guidelines for structuring and partitioning academic papers submitted to SIGMETRICS. It details the proper placement of content, specifying what must reside in the main body (decision-critical claims like theorems and assumptions), what belongs in the appendices (full proofs, extended analysis), and what constitutes the anonymized artifact. Adherence ensures the core argument is reviewable solely from the primary reviewed pages.

Provides detailed strategies for authors responding to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences like SIGMOD. It covers the distinct rules for the mid-round feedback phase and the formal revision letter, emphasizing structured responses, mandatory change highlighting, maintaining anonymity, and strategic content budgeting.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top-tier conferences, detailing how to effectively partition content between the main paper body and supplementary artifacts. It emphasizes the critical rule that all decision-making evidence (e.g., headline results, key performance metrics) must reside within the limited page budget of the main submission, ensuring the work is judgeable even without accessing raw data.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted paper from a full draft to the strict, camera-ready proceedings format required by major conferences like SODA. It covers critical steps such as content compression, de-anonymization (restoring author metadata), adhering to SIAM formatting rules, and establishing proper citation hygiene across multiple versions (proceedings, arXiv, journal).

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of academic manuscript preparation before submission. It covers critical areas including adherence to specific journal formatting (e.g., page-bottom footnotes), structural integrity, ethical compliance (anonymity), and content coherence. Use this tool to ensure your manuscript meets all current guidelines and minimizes rejection risks.

This guide outlines the essential principles for structuring scientific manuscripts submitted to academic journals. It details how to correctly allocate core evidence, lengthy proofs, additional experiments, and multimedia content across the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasized is that all evidence crucial for judging the paper's scientific contribution must reside within the main body text.