Skill UI

This guide outlines the essential principles for structuring scientific manuscripts submitted to academic journals. It details how to correctly allocate core evidence, lengthy proofs, additional experiments, and multimedia content across the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasized is that all evidence crucial for judging the paper's scientific contribution must reside within the main body text.

This guide details best practices for structuring supplementary material in highly technical academic submissions (e.g., STOC). It teaches authors how to design an appendix that facilitates selective verification by reviewers, ensuring that complex proofs, deferred results, and extended discussions are navigable. Key techniques include optimizing the Table of Contents, maintaining strict pointer discipline, and distinguishing between material required for core understanding versus material saved for the full version.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for structuring academic technical papers, specifically addressing the division of content between the main body, appendices, supplementary websites, and mandatory artifacts. It ensures that all decision-critical arguments, soundness claims, and core comparisons are contained within the primary reviewed pages, making the paper fully judgeable without external resources.

This comprehensive guide serves as a router for structuring a high-quality academic manuscript targeting The Accounting Review (TAR). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current stage of the research—whether it's an initial vague idea, preliminary results, or addressing reviewer feedback—and recommends the next specialized skill module to use, ensuring a methodical progression from topic selection through final rebuttal.

This comprehensive pre-upload audit guide ensures submissions meet the strict technical and anonymity requirements for UAI OpenReview. It covers critical aspects like the 8-page main body constraint, combining all content into a single PDF, handling file size caps (15MB/50MB), and performing an identity sweep to maintain double-blind review standards.

This guide details the strategic placement of content for academic submissions, dividing material into Main Part, Appendix, and Supplementary ZIP. It provides best practices for authors to manage proofs, protocols, and code while adhering to strict page limits and double-blind review constraints, ensuring maximum review integrity and clarity.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the 'Related Work' section for top-tier HCI conferences (e.g., UIST). This document emphasizes that the section must function as a novelty proof, not a literature survey. It teaches authors to organize content by capability delta, utilize detailed comparison tables, and trace three critical lineages: technique, toolkit, and commercial practice, ensuring the work's unique contribution is clearly established.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting visualization papers to major conferences like IEEE VIS. It outlines the strict rules for partitioning content, ensuring the core argument remains judgeable from the main body while leveraging supplemental materials (video, code, full data) to demonstrate interaction and reproducibility. Essential reading for academic researchers in the field.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major conferences (like WACV). It details how to properly split content between the main 8-page paper body and the supplementary material. Key focus areas include maintaining double-blind anonymity, structuring evidence for reviewers, and ensuring consistency across multiple revision rounds.

A comprehensive guide detailing the workflow for converting an accepted academic manuscript into its final, archival format for major digital libraries (e.g., ACM Digital Library). It covers critical steps including completing e-rights forms, de-anonymizing content, verifying CCS concepts and keywords, managing metadata, and troubleshooting common production pitfalls to ensure successful publication.

A comprehensive guide for allocating content across academic conference submissions, ensuring critical evidence is visible within strict page limits. It defines rules for triaging material into decisive (body), supporting (appendix/repo), and archival (repository) categories, along with advanced compression tactics for tables and proofs.