Skill UI

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors submitting research papers to PVLDB (Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment). This resource details critical steps, including adherence to multiple deadlines (abstract, full paper), category budget selection, single-blind formatting rules, and author co-contribution caps, ensuring submissions avoid desk rejection.

This comprehensive guide manages the entire project lifecycle for academic conference submissions, such as VLDB. It provides detailed methodologies for initial volume planning, computing optimal submission timelines (month-picking), coordinating group author contributions, and managing the revision bandwidth. It is essential for maintaining rigorous scheduling and mitigating the risk of missed deadlines in fast-paced research environments.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the 'Related Work' section in academic papers, especially in Computer Vision (CV). It teaches authors how to strategically position their research contribution by covering multiple literature shelves: vision methods, domain constraints, concurrent arXiv work, and prior art. This ensures the paper clearly defines a unique gap rather than merely listing citations, adhering to double-blind review standards.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal venue for their Computer Vision paper, specifically addressing the unique identity of WACV (Applications-first) versus major conferences like CVPR, ICCV, and ECCV. It guides authors on whether their contribution is driven by real-world applications/constraints or by advancing core algorithms, and how to choose between the Applications or Algorithms track within WACV.

This comprehensive guide helps authors evaluate if their hydrology or water-science manuscript is a suitable fit for the Water Resources Research journal. It mandates that contributions must be quantitative, generalizable advances, not single-basin case studies. The tool emphasizes rigorous benchmarking, adherence to AGU house styles, and compliance with open data/code deposition policies.

A comprehensive guide for researchers on how to effectively position academic contributions, particularly for top-tier development economics journals. It instructs users to move beyond merely stating a research topic (e.g., 'first to study X in Y') by framing their findings as generalizable claims about underlying mechanisms or quantitative gaps. Key focus areas include linking academic gaps to active development policy debates and strategically distinguishing the work from similar fields like JDE or World Development.

This guide helps authors determine if their research is web-native and which specific research track (e.g., Search, Security, Economics) is the most appropriate fit for submission to the Web Conference (WWW). It outlines critical decision points, distinguishing between general ML methods and web-specific contributions, and advises on optimal submission strategy.

This guide provides comprehensive advice for positioning applied computer vision research for the IEEE/CVF WACV conference. It helps authors assess the manuscript's fit, re-frame the narrative from journal or arXiv styles, and ensure the contribution highlights practical systems, strong empirical evaluation, and application grounding required by top CV venues.

This guide helps researchers position their work within the broader, multidisciplinary development conversation. It teaches how to move beyond simply presenting new data or techniques, focusing instead on bridging disciplines (e.g., economics and political science) and identifying the core conceptual contribution that a non-specialist can grasp. It is crucial for manuscripts aiming for high-impact development journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to World Development (WD) and similar cross-disciplinary journals. It helps authors anticipate and proactively address the diverse and often conflicting objections from double-anonymized, multidisciplinary reviewers (e.g., methodologists vs. contextualists). The strategy covers strengthening methodology, embedding clear development contributions, and structuring the argument to minimize rejection risk.

This guide provides critical advice on how to position scholarly articles, particularly in Comparative Politics and International Relations. It teaches authors to move beyond single-country case studies by framing their work within a live, cross-case academic debate. Learn how to identify theoretical gaps, engage with key literature, and articulate your unique contribution to the wider field.

This skill is essential for scholars working in Comparative Politics and International Relations. It guides the process of transforming single-case empirical findings into robust, portable theoretical arguments. By explicitly defining causal mechanisms, stating scope conditions, and identifying observable implications, the skill ensures the research contribution significantly advances theoretical debates across multiple cases or contexts.