Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist designed for academic authors preparing manuscripts for top-tier journals. It systematically verifies critical details such as footnote conventions, reference formatting, anonymity protocols, word count adherence, and the inclusion of supplementary data/code, ensuring compliance with the journal's most current submission guidelines.

Prepares exhibits for linguistics manuscripts including numbered examples, interlinear glosses, IPA transcription, and quantitative tables. Ensures compliance with Language journal conventions like Leipzig Glossing Rules. Formats syntactic trees and figures for double-anonymous review. Does not generate data but structures existing linguistic evidence.

This tool polishes academic prose for submission to MIS Quarterly, optimizing the writing style for an interdisciplinary Information Systems (IS) audience. It ensures the contribution is front-loaded, adheres strictly to APA 7th edition and MISQ Style Guide conventions (including specific citation formats and heading rules), and helps maintain the manuscript within page limits. Use this during the final stages of drafting.

This specialized skill is designed for creating investor pitch decks for various funding rounds (Seed, Series A/B/C). It builds upon standard presentation rules, adding critical VC-focused constraints such as stage-appropriate metrics, the canonical narrative arc (Problem -> Solution -> Market -> Ask), and finance-grade number conventions. Use this only when actively raising capital, not for general reviews.

A comprehensive guide designed to help authors determine the scope fit, required methodology, and stylistic conventions for submitting manuscripts to Physical Review D (PRD). It covers high-energy physics, cosmology, gravitation, and particle astrophysics, ensuring the work is positioned correctly for an archival academic audience.

This skill guides the structural and stylistic revision of academic manuscripts intended for Production and Operations Management (POM). It ensures the writing effectively front-loads the core operations problem and managerial takeaway, balancing theoretical rigor with practical relevance. The process enforces journal conventions, such as the 32-page limit and author-year citations, guiding authors to move technical derivations to an e-companion.

A comprehensive guide for academic writers in demography and development studies. It teaches authors how to transform technical, results-heavy manuscripts into lucid, essayistic, and argument-driven narratives. Focuses on linking population quantities to their broad development and policy implications, ensuring readability for diverse non-specialist academic audiences and adhering to specific journal house conventions.

Comprehensive stylistic guidelines for submitting quantitative dynamic economic papers to the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). This guide covers critical conventions, including structuring the abstract to lead with quantitative results, mastering Harvard referencing, adhering to LaTeX formatting, and emphasizing dynamic mechanisms for top-tier academic submission.

A comprehensive guide designed for the late-stage polishing of academic manuscripts, specifically targeting submissions to top-tier journals. It focuses on enhancing clarity, improving argument flow, adhering to strict academic house conventions (such as dual abstracts and APA style), and refining prose. This skill ensures the research contribution is clearly articulated and immediately visible to the reader, optimizing the structure and polish of the final paper.

This skill polishes the prose and style of academic accounting manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals like The Accounting Review (TAR). It enforces strict house conventions, including adherence to the Chicago Manual of Style, structuring the abstract (max 150 words), ensuring findings are front-loaded, and maintaining rigorous author anonymization throughout the text for double-blind review.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the submission process for Trends in Cognitive Sciences (TiCS). This resource details the journal's specific requirements for reviews, opinions, and conceptual frameworks, including its highly invited nature, required critical synthesis, and unique structural conventions (e.g., Box panels). Use this to assess the fit of your work before submission.

This guide helps polish academic manuscripts for submission to specialized journals, such as the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It ensures adherence to institutional house conventions (numbered sections, author-date referencing, concise abstract) and, critically, structures the argumentation to explain the underlying economic mechanism *before* presenting formal econometric specifications, elevating the paper's scholarly rigor.