Skill UI

This guide instructs authors on how to elevate empirical findings from mere data points into rigorous theoretical contributions. It teaches the method of identifying the core academic 'conversation,' specifying theoretical gaps, and framing the research as a distinct 'move' that advances or challenges existing theories. Essential for improving scholarly impact and writing high-level academic papers.

This guide helps researchers structure the Policy Contribution Statement required by journals like JPP&M. It teaches how to transform solid research findings and data estimates into actionable, evidence-based policy recommendations. Focus areas include defining the policy conversation, identifying specific regulated actors, ensuring recommendations are within the actor's authority, and strictly linking claims to the empirical evidence provided.

This guide helps authors craft sophisticated introductions by positioning their research within an existing academic conversation. It teaches how to move beyond merely identifying a 'gap' to actively 'problematizing' the field by challenging core assumptions, and how to explicitly demonstrate the cross-departmental relevance of findings to maximize impact with journal editors and reviewers.

This guide helps authors structure their academic manuscripts for top-tier Information Systems journals (e.g., MISQ). It emphasizes moving beyond simple gap-spotting by requiring authors to explicitly join an established IS conversation, keep the IT artifact central to the theory, and clearly differentiate the contribution from parent disciplines and adjacent venues.

This guide instructs authors on how to strategically position their research manuscript within the established body of Operations Management (OM) literature. Instead of claiming an unstudied 'void,' the focus is on joining and advancing specific 'operational conversations' within canonical OM streams (e.g., queueing, supply chain, revenue management). It emphasizes differentiating contributions based on novel operational mechanisms or decision levers, ensuring the paper's fit is clear to expert reviewers and editors.

This plugin integrates the OpenViking context database, providing powerful long-term memory, session archiving, and semantic recall for OpenClaw agents. It enables agents to query, debug, and manage persistent knowledge bases, significantly enhancing conversational depth and complex tool usage.

A comprehensive guide for positioning academic manuscripts within the literature of Organization Science. It teaches authors to move beyond simply identifying research gaps (gap-spotting) and instead focus on problematizing existing assumptions and joining established, interdisciplinary scholarly conversations. This involves bridging micro and macro levels and integrating theories from diverse fields like sociology, economics, and psychology.

This skill guides researchers in developing theory-driven research questions specifically tailored for submission to top academic journals, particularly Organization Science. It assesses whether a research idea genuinely focuses on organizational processes, identifies the relevant theoretical conversation, and evaluates the suitability of the chosen academic venue against competitors (e.g., ASQ, AMJ). It ensures the question has a clear contribution source and appropriate level of analysis.

This skill guides the transformation of a literature review from a mere descriptive catalogue into a highly focused, argumentative structure. It teaches how to synthesize existing research to identify a specific, unresolved theoretical tension or assumption failure within a named scholarly conversation. The goal is to precisely position a new theory or mechanism as the necessary resolution to this gap.

A specialized methodology for theoretically placing a new model within an existing academic conversation. It instructs the user to build a 'rival map' by identifying diagnostic phenomena, contrasting them with established rival theories, and explicitly stating where the new theory excels, surpasses, or subsumes existing claims. This approach moves beyond simple literature review to active theoretical confrontation.

This guide teaches authors how to frame their academic research by joining a specific, established 'accounting conversation' rather than claiming to fill an unstudied 'gap.' It provides a structured approach to identifying key frontier works, articulating the paper's precise marginal contribution (the 'marginal move'), and strategically justifying why the paper belongs in a specific journal, such as RAST, over its academic siblings.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors submitting to the SIGDIAL Conference on Discourse and Dialogue. It helps evaluate if a dialogue system manuscript is suitable for the venue, refining the paper's narrative, strengthening empirical evidence, and understanding the specific requirements for discourse and conversational AI research to maximize submission success.