Skill UI

This guide deconstructs the two-stage review and decision-making process for NAACL (and similar ACL venues). It details the division of labor between the initial ARR review phase and the final program committee commitment stage, offering strategic advice on how authors can optimize their submissions and responses at each point.

This guide helps authors structure highly technical security papers, especially for venues with strict page limits like NDSS. It details how to allocate content across the main body, ethics considerations, and appendices, ensuring the core decision-making arguments remain self-contained and maximally persuasive to reviewers by passing the 'dependency test'.

This skill is designed for building complex, audit-ready financial models in Excel. Use it for 3-statement projections, DCF valuation, LBO analysis, unit economics, or advanced scenario planning. It enforces professional standards like the three-zone architecture (Inputs, Calculation, Outputs), strict formula discipline, and robust auditing gates, ensuring the output is suitable for high-stakes decision-making.

This comprehensive guide assists reviewers and authors in determining the most appropriate venue for programming language research within the SIGPLAN community. It provides a detailed 'center-of-mass' test, helping categorize contributions based on whether they emphasize metatheory (POPL), performance engineering (PLDI), functional techniques (ICFCP), or the broad design scope characteristic of OOPSLA. It guides the decision-making process for academic submissions.

Guides the rigorous development of theoretical models and research frameworks for Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscripts. It covers analytical, empirical, and behavioral tracks, ensuring that all assumptions and mechanisms are deeply grounded in real-world operational constraints and decision-making processes, thereby building a defensible academic argument.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Psychological Science. It guides researchers through the complex publication process, making critical decisions based on the manuscript type (e.g., Research Article, Registered Report) and the current stage of development. It is crucial for managing constraints like tight word limits and rigorous open-science requirements, directing users to the correct specialized skills at every step.

This guide assists researchers in evaluating the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Scientific Decision Making. It covers journal scope, required methodologies (e.g., system modeling, policy evaluation), structural improvements, common formatting pitfalls (footnotes, Arabic numerals), and cross-journal selection criteria to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top-tier conferences, detailing how to effectively partition content between the main paper body and supplementary artifacts. It emphasizes the critical rule that all decision-making evidence (e.g., headline results, key performance metrics) must reside within the limited page budget of the main submission, ensuring the work is judgeable even without accessing raw data.

This guide details the rigorous, multi-stage academic review process for submissions to top-tier conferences like SODA (Symposium on Discrete Algorithms). It covers the entire lifecycle, from initial submission and abstract assignment to deep technical refereeing, author rebuttal phases, and final PC decision-making. It provides actionable advice on writing style, addressing reviewer comments, and improving borderline papers.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission and evaluation pipeline for TACAS (Tools and Algorithms for Scientific Applications). It models key features such as category-specific blind review, the mandatory parallel artifact evaluation for tool papers, and the single-round conference decision-making process, helping authors strategically prepare their submissions.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for structuring academic technical papers, specifically addressing the division of content between the main body, appendices, supplementary websites, and mandatory artifacts. It ensures that all decision-critical arguments, soundness claims, and core comparisons are contained within the primary reviewed pages, making the paper fully judgeable without external resources.

This guide models the entire lifecycle of academic conference submissions, detailing stages like bidding, review writing, author response, and decision-making. It helps researchers strategically plan their work to maximize impact, preemptively address potential weaknesses, and optimize their research communication strategy in a competitive academic environment.