Skill UI

This guide provides a structured methodology for academic writing, enabling researchers to move beyond stating a mere 'lack of research.' It teaches users how to rigorously pinpoint the theoretical gap—such as an unaddressed mechanism, an inexplicable anomaly, or an undefined boundary condition—that existing theories fail to explain. Essential for strengthening the theoretical depth and academic impact of scholarly papers.

A comprehensive workflow router designed to guide researchers through the entire process of preparing manuscripts for top-tier business journals, such as the Nankai Business Review. This guide does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured, stage-gated approach covering theory gap identification, hypothesis development, rigorous measurement validation (e.g., SEM, validity), contextualization, and strategic revision (R&R). It ensures that the paper meets the necessary standards for theoretical contribution and empirical depth.

This plugin integrates the OpenViking context database, providing powerful long-term memory, session archiving, and semantic recall for OpenClaw agents. It enables agents to query, debug, and manage persistent knowledge bases, significantly enhancing conversational depth and complex tool usage.

This skill guides authors submitting work related to Operations Research (OR). It helps assess whether a manuscript provides a genuine theoretical or methodological advance in fields like optimization, stochastic processes, queueing theory, and mathematical modeling. It emphasizes the necessity of rigorous proofs, mathematical depth, and positioning the contribution against existing OR literature, rather than merely presenting a case study application.

This tool helps authors determine the suitability of their academic manuscript for the highly theoretical journal, Organization Studies (OS). It guides authors on required depth, theoretical contribution (process, institutional, critical), qualitative methods, and European organizational theory framing, ensuring alignment with the journal's high academic bar and academic discourse.

A comprehensive guide for authors considering Physical Review E (PRE) as a target venue. It details the journal's scope in statistical, nonlinear, and soft-matter physics, emphasizing methodological rigor over headline novelty. Use this skill to assess if your manuscript meets the required standards for completeness, reproducibility, and technical depth before submission.

This guide details the best practices for submitting supplementary material (like full proofs, benchmark data, and source code) for major academic conferences. It instructs authors on strategically placing content to enhance depth while strictly maintaining double-blind anonymity and ensuring perfect consistency between the main paper and its supporting appendices.

This guide assists researchers in determining the topic suitability, appropriate format (research paper, review, special issue), and correct academic placement for manuscripts targeting 'Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence' (PR&AI). It outlines the journal's focused scope across core AI domains like ML, CV, and NLP, helping authors avoid common submission pitfalls and ensuring their contribution has sufficient originality and academic depth.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess if their manuscript is a suitable fit for Proceedings of the IEEE. It details the journal's high standards, guiding the transformation of primary research into comprehensive, balanced, and forward-looking review, survey, or tutorial articles. Use this resource to understand the required scope, synthesis depth, and common pitfalls to avoid desk rejection.

This skill guides researchers on whether a proposed research topic is suitable for a high-level synthesis journal (like Psychological Bulletin). It assesses the existing literature's depth, general academic significance, and whether the contribution is synthesizing prior findings. It determines the most appropriate synthesis methodology—such as meta-analysis, systematic review, or qualitative meta-synthesis—by comparing the nature of the pooled data.

This auxiliary skill helps researchers assess the suitability of their academic manuscripts in economics, social science, or management for submission to high-level journals like 'Reform of Economic System'. It provides comprehensive guidance on journal positioning, required theoretical depth, appropriate methodology, structural requirements, and common pitfalls, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness and increase acceptance chances.

This tool guides authors in evaluating whether a physics review manuscript is suitable for the Reports on Progress in Physics (RoPP) journal. It provides comprehensive details on the journal's required scope, expected depth of critical synthesis, methodological standards, and official submission guidelines, ensuring the work meets the high academic bar of an authoritative progress report.