Skill UI

This skill serves as an essential venue-selection and framing aid for researchers targeting Arthritis & Rheumatology (A&R). It guides authors on the scope, required evidence bar, and structural standards for publishing research on autoimmune and musculoskeletal diseases (e.g., RA, SLE, OA). It covers guidelines for clinical trials, observational studies, and basic/translational immunology, including mandatory reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE) and house style requirements.

This guide helps researchers determine if their study—particularly in clinical neurology or translational neuroscience—meets the high standards of leading journals like Brain. It provides detailed insights into required mechanistic depth, evidence types (e.g., genetics, biomarkers), appropriate reporting guidelines (STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA), and common desk-reject expectations. It is a venue-fit aid, detailing the scientific rigor needed for submission.

A comprehensive guide for conducting advanced, methodologically rigorous data analysis for manuscripts in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It covers specialized techniques such as survival analysis, handling endogeneity (IV, selection bias), advanced panel data models (Callaway–Sant'Anna), and rigorous qualitative coding schemes. The goal is to ensure that findings are theoretically robust and translate into actionable, venture-relevant insights, moving beyond simple p-value reporting.

This skill provides a comprehensive fit and formatting guide for submitting high-impact clinical and surgical research to European Urology. It assesses the study's required evidence level, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and alignment with EAU/Elsevier house style. It is a vital aid for authors needing to re-frame their work for optimal journal acceptance.

A comprehensive framework for ensuring rigorous scientific reproducibility in systems papers. It details how to establish a full provenance ledger (tracking hardware, software commits, and workloads), manage performance variance through repeated runs and statistical reporting, and implement automated pipelines so that all reported figures can be regenerated from raw data.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers assess the suitability and structure of clinical neurology studies for submission to JAMA Neurology. It covers scope fit, evidence requirements (e.g., validated endpoints, adequate power), mandated reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and specific journal house style and submission checklists. This is a venue-fit aid, not clinical advice.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting psychiatric, epidemiological, or neuropsychiatric research to JAMA Psychiatry. It assesses the study's fit, required methodological rigor (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and adherence to the journal's specific reporting guidelines and house style. It helps authors re-frame their work to ensure clinical relevance and suitability for publication.

A comprehensive guide for analyzing and reporting findings in entrepreneurial research, specifically tailored for high-level academic journals. It covers advanced econometric techniques necessary to address common data challenges in venture panel data, such as survivorship bias, selection into founding, endogeneity, and attrition. It ensures methodological rigor and robust reporting.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to machine learning conferences like NeurIPS. It details the rigorous standards for data splitting, hyperparameter reporting, random-seed protocols, and compute transparency required for a main-track paper. It also helps authors strategically decide between the main track and the MLRC/TMLR routes based on their core contribution (replication vs. novelty).

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for designing rigorous and defensible evaluation sections for machine learning and information retrieval papers, particularly for top-tier conferences like WSDM. It covers the four critical evidence quadrants—Effectiveness, Validity, Efficiency, and Robustness—and details necessary protocols, such as temporal splits, proper baseline selection (including heuristics), ablation studies, and hardware-aware performance reporting. Use this when auditing or writing the experimental section of a research paper.

This skill structures free-text adverse event narratives into the mandatory ICH E2B(R3) format. It populates critical fields required for regulatory submissions (like FAERS/EudraVigilance), including suspect drugs, reactions (mapped via MedDRA), seriousness criteria, and reaction outcomes. Use it when generating Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from clinical narratives.

Expert DORA compliance advisor for EU financial entities and ICT providers. Covers ICT risk management, incident classification and reporting, threat-led penetration testing, third-party risk oversight, Register of Information, and contractual provisions with article-level citations. Use for gap analysis and policy drafting.