Skill UI

A comprehensive guide modeling the multi-stage, double-blind peer review process for JCRD. It outlines the steps from initial submission to final publication, detailing the roles of editors, reviewers, and the author. Users can leverage this guide to calibrate expectations, understand the strategic leverage points at each stage (submission, revision), and prepare for potential publication outcomes.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Development Economics (JDE) via Editorial Manager. This guide ensures compliance with route-specific limits (e.g., short-paper caps, full-length requirements), data replication readiness, single-anonymized review standards, and adherence to journal policies (e.g., language consistency, submission caps). Use it as the final check before submission.

A comprehensive workflow guide for authors responding to major journal decision letters (R&R or reject-and-resubmit). This resource provides a structured approach to triaging conflicting referee comments, prioritizing editor concerns, planning necessary new experimental treatments, and crafting a professional, persuasive response letter to maximize publication chances in top-tier academic journals.

A comprehensive checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to journals like JEBO via Elsevier Editorial Manager. It ensures compliance with strict formatting rules, including abstract length, keyword usage, JEL codes, author-date referencing, and mandatory declarations (COI, AI usage). This tool helps authors verify their submission package before final upload.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to journals like JEEA. It outlines the strategic approach for drafting rebuttal and revision letters, focusing on prioritizing the co-editor's mandates, responding to conflicting referee comments point-by-point, and structuring the revised manuscript effectively. This skill helps authors navigate the complex peer-review process.

Designed for authors submitting to general-interest journals like JEEA. This skill helps stress-test a manuscript by simulating the two-gate decision process: the co-editor's fit assessment (desk-reject risk) and the referees' technical critiques. It guides authors on pre-empting common objections—such as general interest lack, identification weakness, or model fragility—by strategically framing the paper before submission.

A comprehensive guide for assembling the required data and code replication package for manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA). This package ensures compliance with the DCAS standard, enabling the journal's Data Editor to verify the reproducibility of empirical, simulation, or experimental results before formal acceptance. It outlines the mandatory structure, README contents, and execution steps.

A comprehensive guide for authors commissioning or revising a literature survey for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It provides strategies for negotiating the survey's scope with the editor, anticipating critical questions from expert referees (e.g., balance, completeness, framework), and planning for major revision rounds. Essential for high-level academic writing.

This guide details the critical 'proposal-first' approach for submitting survey articles to the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It walks authors through crafting a compelling ~10-page sketch, covering the required structure, from defining the field and animating question to outlining the organizing framework and provisional conclusions. Learn how to maximize your chances of securing a commission from the journal editor.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors revising academic survey papers, particularly in economics (JEL). It details how to triage complex editor and referee feedback—including coverage gaps, balance complaints, structural weaknesses, and accessibility issues. It covers best practices for writing a detailed, point-by-point response letter and ensuring the scholarly integrity of the revised work.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a survey or review article for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, from initial topic selection and proposing the scope to systematic literature synthesis, structuring the argument, and handling revisions based on editor/referee feedback. It ensures the output is a scholarly synthesis, not a primary research paper.

This guide details the unique, editor-driven submission process for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It advises authors on managing scope, length, and framing when working with an editorial team, rather than anonymous referees. Key strategies include treating the proposal as a contract, prioritizing accessibility for a broad audience, and negotiating scope early in the process.