Skill UI

This skill is designed to assess the suitability of international macroeconomics and finance manuscripts for the IMF Economic Review. It evaluates the paper's fit, theoretical rigor, evidence quality, and adherence to open-economy principles. It provides crucial pre-submission self-checks, potential desk-reject risks, and re-routing suggestions to guide authors toward the most appropriate academic venue.

This skill guides authors to evaluate if their mechanistic immunology study meets the high standards of the journal Immunity. It serves as a comprehensive pre-submission checklist, detailing required evidence (in vivo validation, single-cell genomics, multi-omic data), necessary mechanistic depth, structural requirements, and strict submission guidelines to ensure the core advance is the immune mechanism.

This comprehensive skill is a guide for authors to assess if their Information Systems (IS) manuscript is suitable for the prestigious Information Systems Research (ISR) journal. It analyzes the journal's rigorous requirements, including the need for genuine IS theoretical contributions, quantitative methodology (econometrics, analytical modeling), and adherence to specific submission standards. It functions as a pre-submission checklist and re-framing tool, helping authors understand the required depth in theory, evidence, and structure before targeting the venue.

This skill helps authors determine if their manuscript fits the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). It provides guidance on conference positioning, evidence requirements, framing, and submission checks. It ensures linguistic grounding and NLP relevance are visible to reviewers. Use it for venue selection, re-framing papers from journal style, and diagnosing submission risks like desk rejection. Always verify official CFPs before submission.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors determining the fit of their empirical software engineering (SE) manuscript for the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). It helps authors rigorously check the study design, evidence bar, proper framing, and necessary re-framing required to transform a journal or arXiv-style paper into a high-quality conference submission suitable for ESEM reviewers. It focuses on measurement validity, experimental rigor, and evidence synthesis.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the evidence bundle required for robotics research submissions. It details the critical components—including hardware ledgers, time-stamped logs, configuration files, code, and data—necessary to ensure that scientific claims are fully auditable and reproducible, addressing the needs of skeptical reviewers.

Organizes declared scope, controlled documents, risk files, traceability, and readiness evidence for ISO 13485, ISO 14971, ISO/IEC 17025, and ISO 15189 human review, with deterministic local checks and separate certification, accreditation, FDA QMSR, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers assess the suitability and structure of clinical neurology studies for submission to JAMA Neurology. It covers scope fit, evidence requirements (e.g., validated endpoints, adequate power), mandated reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and specific journal house style and submission checklists. This is a venue-fit aid, not clinical advice.

This guide provides a structured checklist and framework for researchers to assess whether their clinical study meets the general-medical-importance bar of top-tier journals, such as JAMA. It helps authors determine if their findings are broadly relevant to practicing clinicians, if the evidence level is sufficient, and if the article type matches the journal's requirements, preventing premature submission.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist and style manual for authors submitting papers to the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (JCAD&CG). It covers all necessary formatting details, including the four elements of a reportative abstract, the problem-gap-contribution structure, adherence to GB/T 7714 citation standards, and specific rules for graphical evidence presentation in CAD and graphics research.

This guide walks authors through the entire academic publishing lifecycle for international marketing journals. It details the editorial pipeline, from initial administrative checks and editor screening to the detailed review process, including common desk-reject triggers (e.g., single-country data, lack of equivalence evidence). It also provides strategies for productive waiting, drafting anticipated objections, and managing revision decisions.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. It assesses the suitability of clinical studies across endocrine and metabolic systems, covering scope, required evidence standards, reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), and house style. Use this tool for pre-submission self-checking to ensure your manuscript meets the journal's high academic and clinical standards.