Skill UI

This skill helps authors assess the suitability of their translational or mechanistic manuscript for the Journal of Clinical Investigation (JCI). It provides detailed guidance on meeting JCI's high standards, emphasizing primary evidence from human clinical samples, clear mechanistic insight into disease, and appropriate framing. Use this tool when targeting JCI or when needing to select the most appropriate high-impact scientific venue.

A comprehensive skill designed for authors targeting the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). It provides an exhaustive checklist covering the journal's high academic standards, required evidence depth (such as Phase III randomized controlled trials), appropriate study scope (solid tumors, biomarkers), mandatory formatting, and the latest submission guidelines. Use this tool to optimize your manuscript and improve its suitability for publication in a top-tier oncology journal.

A specialized tool for researchers aiming to publish in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (JEBO). It helps authors assess the suitability of their behavioral, institutional, or organizational economics manuscript by analyzing the journal's scope, methodological bar, required evidence, and formatting standards. It serves as a pre-submission re-framing and checklist mechanism.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for targeting the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM). It analyzes the manuscript's fit, required mechanistic depth, expected evidence bar (e.g., in vivo models, genetic dissection), and specific formatting requirements for submissions to this highly selective immunology journal. Use this tool for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It details the journal's positioning, scope requirements across various chemical sub-fields (organic, inorganic, physical, etc.), the required depth of evidence, article structure (Communications vs. Articles), and provides a detailed checklist to prevent common desk-reject mistakes. Use this when refining a chemistry manuscript for a top-tier publication.

A comprehensive checklist for auditing submissions to top-tier data mining conferences like KDD. This guide covers critical areas including track declaration, OpenReview profile completeness for all authors, adherence to strict page limits, double-blind anonymity rules, and quantifying post-launch performance evidence. Essential for maximizing acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors to assess if their high-impact photonics research meets the broad significance and methodological rigor required by journals like Light: Science & Applications. It helps authors re-frame specialized technical results into a Nature-style narrative, focusing on conceptual advances and quantitative evidence.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating manuscript suitability for Molecular Psychiatry. It guides authors on journal positioning, required scope (e.g., psychiatric genetics, translational neuroscience), necessary evidence depth (dual-level evidence), structural guidelines, and official submission checklists to maximize publication chances.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for authors aiming to submit catalysis research to Nature Catalysis. It assesses not only the technical scope (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electrocatalysis) but also the mechanistic depth, broad significance, required evidence (in situ spectroscopy, DFT), and adherence to the journal's strict house style and formatting guidelines.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting Nature Energy. It covers the journal's specific scope, requiring submissions to have broad significance across the entire energy value chain—from materials science to policy. It details the required methodological rigor, evidence standards, structure, and submission checklist necessary for high-impact energy research.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the rigorous process of assessing whether their neuroscience manuscript meets the high conceptual and methodological standards of Nature Neuroscience. It covers journal positioning, required multi-scale evidence (anatomy, physiology, behavior), standard house style, and official submission checklists, ensuring authors understand how to frame their work for top-tier publication.

A comprehensive guide for stress-testing the evidence supporting ML claims before submitting to top-tier academic conferences. Covers rigorous auditing of baselines, ablation studies, robustness checks, data leakage, and calibrating claims against evidence strength, ensuring scientific reproducibility.