Skill UI

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Management Science (INFORMS). It systematically verifies adherence to crucial publishing standards, including double-anonymization, author-year formatting, abstract length constraints, fee/waiver eligibility, and the mandatory Code and Data Disclosure package using an AsCollected URL. Use this guide right before final submission to ensure maximum readiness.

This comprehensive guide details the complex nine-week process of transforming an accepted academic manuscript into the final, published camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring acknowledgments and affiliations), executing promised revisions, adherence to publisher formatting rules (ACM/IEEE), preparing artifact links, and structuring the accompanying presentation talk.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors submitting technical papers to the MICRO conference. It details strict formatting rules (e.g., max 11 pages, no appendix), critical deadline management (EDT time zones), and technical pre-flight checks required before HotCRP submission. Essential for ensuring the manuscript meets top-tier academic standards.

This guide details the rigorous process of selecting and structuring academic content for venues with extremely strict page limits, such as major computer science conferences. It teaches authors how to 'triage' material, classifying information into critical, supportive, or discardable categories, ensuring the core argument remains visible and complete even when traditional supplementary files are prohibited.

This comprehensive guide provides the final mandatory preflight checks before submitting a manuscript to Mind via ScholarOne. It details crucial guidelines for triple-anonymous review, covering word limits (approx. 8,000 words), abstract length (50–200 words), mandatory line numbering, and adherence to the MIND house style. Using this checklist ensures your submission meets all academic and formatting requirements, preventing rejection due to technical or anonymity failures.

This skill is a comprehensive guide for researchers to determine if their Information Systems (IS) research manuscript meets the high academic standards of MIS Quarterly (MISQ). It evaluates the theoretical contribution, methodological rigor (behavioral, design-science, economics), and overall fit, providing crucial guidance on re-framing the work or suggesting alternative academic venues before submission.

This guide provides a structured methodology for authors to articulate the core contribution of their Information Systems (IS) research for top-tier academic journals, such as MIS Quarterly. It ensures that the paper explicitly states the new knowledge produced (e.g., behavioral mechanisms, design principles, economic effects), justifies the manuscript's length, and rigorously connects theoretical advances with practical and societal implications, thereby avoiding claims of being merely 'incremental' or 'technical' exercises.

This guide helps authors structure their academic manuscripts for top-tier Information Systems journals (e.g., MISQ). It emphasizes moving beyond simple gap-spotting by requiring authors to explicitly join an established IS conversation, keep the IT artifact central to the theory, and clearly differentiate the contribution from parent disciplines and adjacent venues.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions from top-tier academic journals like MIS Quarterly. This skill teaches how to structure an auditable, point-by-point rebuttal letter, systematically addressing reviewer concerns, enhancing methodological rigor (e.g., common-method bias, identification), updating transparency materials, and adhering to strict formatting constraints.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies workflow compliance (e.g., ScholarOne), double-anonymity, adherence to strict page limits, preparation of the transparency commitment, and proper formatting (APA 7th). This guide ensures authors are fully prepared for the rigorous academic submission process.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers preparing submissions for top-tier Information Systems journals like MIS Quarterly. It helps validate if a research idea is genuinely IT-centric, assigns it to one of the four core IS traditions (Behavioral, Design Science, Economics, Organizational), and selects the optimal manuscript genre to ensure scope and fit for publication.

This tool polishes academic prose for submission to MIS Quarterly, optimizing the writing style for an interdisciplinary Information Systems (IS) audience. It ensures the contribution is front-loaded, adheres strictly to APA 7th edition and MISQ Style Guide conventions (including specific citation formats and heading rules), and helps maintain the manuscript within page limits. Use this during the final stages of drafting.