Skill UI

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to top-tier academic journals, such as Management World. It guides users through critical checks on formatting, double-blind compliance, reference standards, word count, and required supplementary materials. Use this guide to ensure your paper meets strict technical requirements and avoid early rejection during the initial review phase.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for formatting tables and figures for high-level academic journals. It details rigorous requirements, such as adhering to the three-line table format (booktabs), limiting columns, correctly placing standard errors, and ensuring figures meet minimum DPI and color constraints. Use this when transforming raw statistical outputs into publication-ready, professional content.

Provides a comprehensive, detailed audit checklist for authors submitting papers intended for NAACL. This guide walks through the complex ACL Rolling Review (ARR) submission cycle, ensuring the manuscript passes all mandatory technical gates—such as anonymity checks, format compliance, structural requirements, and accurate declaration—before the final conference commitment. Essential for navigating the unique timeline and rigorous standards of top NLP conferences.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for assessing whether an economics manuscript is suitable for submission to Nankai Economic Studies. It details the journal's scope, required structure (abstract, keywords, formatting), and outlines common rejection risks. It helps researchers refine their problem consciousness and adapt their writing style to meet the standards of high-level Chinese academic journals.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for authors aiming to submit catalysis research to Nature Catalysis. It assesses not only the technical scope (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electrocatalysis) but also the mechanistic depth, broad significance, required evidence (in situ spectroscopy, DFT), and adherence to the journal's strict house style and formatting guidelines.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their research fits the scope of Nature Synthesis. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be a novel synthetic method or strategy (rather than just an application). The guide details specific requirements across organic, inorganic, materials, and electrochemical synthesis, covering method rigor, evidence standards, and journal formatting rules.

A comprehensive checklist for authors preparing to submit academic conference papers. This guide details mandatory final audits covering double-blind anonymity, ethical compliance, formatting standards, conflict declarations, and the strict submission timeline, ensuring the paper passes pre-upload quality gates.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It outlines the journal's stringent editorial standards, including the required evidence bar, structured abstract formatting, and best practices for clinical manuscript submission, helping authors gauge manuscript fit and preparation needs.

This tool converts various academic citation formats (e.g., APA, Harvard) into the specific Vancouver/ICMJE numbered style required by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It ensures citations are numbered sequentially by appearance, handles limited author lists (first 6 + et al.), uses NLM abbreviations for journals, and performs a comprehensive evidence audit, ensuring the manuscript adheres to the strict standards of high-impact medical publishing.

This guide assists researchers in transforming bloated or loosely structured academic manuscripts into the terse, plain IMRAD format required by top-tier journals like NEJM. It focuses on maximizing clarity, enforcing claim-first results based on statistical evidence, curbing over-stated clinical implications, and ensuring the discussion explicitly covers limitations and necessary scope restriction.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for authors targeting top-tier AI conferences like NeurIPS. It guides researchers in refining their manuscript's narrative, ensuring the contribution meets the venue's standards for broad, high-novelty machine learning research. It covers topic fit, evidence bar requirements, structuring the argument, handling interdisciplinary claims, and navigating the specific submission cycle rules for maximizing acceptance chances.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors aiming to submit manuscripts to Nature Geoscience. It details how to comply with strict journal limits on word count, display items, and references. By implementing a triage order—such as moving protocols to Online Methods and extended data to Supplementary Information—authors can ensure the main text remains focused, concise, and impactful.