Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory submission requirements for major AI conferences like CIKM. It covers critical areas such as strict page budget rules (including appendices), mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure, EasyChair nomination processes, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and adhering to crucial deadlines like the abstract-gate week to prevent desk rejection.

Provides a comprehensive guide to managing the end-to-end workflow for submitting academic papers to major conferences like CIKM. It outlines multi-track coordination, crucial milestones (abstract gates, camera-ready), and assigns specific roles (e.g., Form Owner, Compliance Owner) to prevent common academic failures, ensuring timely and compliant publication.

A comprehensive project management framework for authors submitting theoretical papers to major conferences (e.g., COLT). This guide outlines the entire lifecycle, emphasizing backward planning from the deadline, milestone setting (Result Freeze, Verification Pass), and critical quality checks, including proof assembly, anonymity sweeps, and rebuttal response. It is designed to mitigate common academic writing risks and ensure a robust submission process.

This tool models the comprehensive, multi-stage academic review pipeline used by CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). It simulates the entire double-anonymous review process, including reviewer assignment, initial first-round rejection gates, the critical author rebuttal window, and the multi-tiered decision-making hierarchy (Reviewers -> ACs -> SACs). It helps authors understand where their efforts have the highest leverage in influencing the paper's outcome.

A specialized routing tool designed for academic researchers submitting manuscripts to top-tier Computer Science and AI conferences. It helps users navigate complex decision points, such as selecting the best venue (e.g., ICML vs NeurIPS), matching contribution types (theory, system, empirical study), and adhering to specific submission guidelines and review constraints.

This guide provides expert advice on crafting the "Related Work" section for academic submissions, particularly those targeting CSCW. It details how to successfully integrate four distinct literatures (CSCW lineage, PACMHCI work, neighboring venues, and source disciplines), ensuring citations are era-correct, arguments are contestable, and the review process is navigated rigorously.

This tool maps the 'dark funnel,' identifying brand awareness and consideration signals from untracked sources like Reddit, AI chatbots, and word-of-mouth. It aggregates diverse data—including branded search trends, community mentions, and podcast data—to provide a comprehensive view of the true buyer journey, allowing marketers to measure influence beyond traditional analytics platforms.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers determine if their empirical project qualifies for a Developmental Psychology journal. It emphasizes that the core contribution must focus on 'developmental change' across the lifespan (age effects, trajectories, or underlying mechanisms), rather than merely describing a single-age phenomenon. It provides a four-gate fit test covering developmental claims, theory advancement, design credibility, and open-science readiness, guiding researchers on framing and proper submission tiering.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for authors submitting papers to EACL (Computational Linguistics). It covers critical areas such as adherence to format gates (8/4 content pages, required Limitations section), strict anonymity requirements, mandatory declarations (Responsible NLP, preprint status), and crucial advice regarding the single, non-fallback submission cycle. Use this before uploading to the ACL Rolling Review cycle.

A detailed auditing guide for submitting to major academic conferences, such as ECCV. It covers critical aspects including multi-stage submission deadlines (CET timezone), strict LNCS formatting rules (14 pages single-column), policy adherence (dual-submission, embargo rules), and pre-upload checks to mitigate rejection risks. Essential for researchers managing academic publishing workflows.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to The Economic Journal (EJ). It covers format requirements, single-blind review guidelines, author-date referencing, JEL codes, data/code policy (Zenodo), and the detailed submission process via Editorial Express. Use this checklist for the final mechanical gate check before submission.

A guide for structuring rigorous economic policy manuscripts for a dual audience. It dictates that the main text must be non-technical and policy-first, written accessibly for policymakers, while all technical derivations, proofs, and full estimators are relegated to the appendix to maintain academic rigor.