Skill UI

This guide teaches authors how to position their research manuscript for top-tier journals like Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It emphasizes framing the work within specific sociological theoretical programs (e.g., symbolic interaction, structure–individual link) rather than general psychological findings, ensuring the contribution speaks directly to the field's ongoing academic debates.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the scope and general significance of their theoretical computer science work. It introduces the 'breadth test' (corridor, lineage, technique) and a detailed routing map to advise whether the paper is best suited for a flagship, broad-scope venue like STOC, or a more specialized conference (e.g., SODA, ITCS, CCC). It provides a structured decision procedure for optimizing academic publication success.

This guide outlines the rigorous process for submitting and evaluating research artifacts for academic conferences (TACAS/ETAPS). It details the mandatory two-round evaluation system, covering tool-demonstration papers and general research case studies. Authors must package their work to achieve badges like Available, Functional, and Reusable, ensuring maximum reproducibility and environmental compatibility on a clean virtual machine.

This skill guides authors on positioning information retrieval (IR) work for the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). It functions as a venue-selection and manuscript re-framing tool, ensuring the submission aligns with TREC's focus on shared evaluation tracks, test collections, and NIST-style benchmarking. It helps authors structure evidence, understand reviewer expectations, and distinguish the work from general CS conference submissions.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous evaluation process for targeting The Economic Journal (EJ). It assesses whether a manuscript has compelling general interest, sound methodology, and broad applicability beyond a niche field. It covers structural requirements, expected evidence quality, and common submission pitfalls, helping authors strategically position their work for a wide academic readership.

This skill guides authors on positioning foundational and conceptually general robotics research for submission to The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR). It evaluates the manuscript's depth, generality, and conceptual framework, helping authors re-frame single-demonstration results into field-advancing principles. It also assists in choosing between IJRR and competing venues like IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO).

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing analytic philosophy manuscripts for The Journal of Philosophy. It details the journal's high standards for originality, broad significance, and structural rigor. Learn how to focus your argument, engage with the strongest counterarguments, and ensure your work meets the expectations of a top generalist venue.

This skill helps authors assess if their manuscript (covering theology, philosophy, or religious history) is a strong fit for The Journal of Religion. It provides exhaustive guidance on scholarly requirements, argument depth, methodological rigor, and submission norms, ensuring the work meets the high standards of a broad, generalist academic audience.

This skill analyzes whether an analytic philosophy manuscript meets the extremely high standards of top-tier generalist journals like The Philosophical Review. It assesses the originality of the thesis, the rigor of the argument, the depth of engagement with strongest objections, and overall suitability for publication in highly selective academic venues.

This comprehensive guide is designed to help authors assess the methodological and theoretical suitability of their manuscript for Transportation Research Part B. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be a generalizable method, model, or theorem (e.g., in traffic flow, network optimization, or choice modeling), rather than a simple applied case study. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and ensuring rigorous analytical justification.

This guide helps researchers determine if their project qualifies as a visualization contribution (beyond general HCI or ML). It provides structured criteria for choosing the best conference venue (e.g., IEEE VIS, EuroVis, CHI) and mapping the work to one of the six core visualization areas based on contribution type and evidence maturity.

This comprehensive guide helps authors evaluate if their hydrology or water-science manuscript is a suitable fit for the Water Resources Research journal. It mandates that contributions must be quantitative, generalizable advances, not single-basin case studies. The tool emphasizes rigorous benchmarking, adherence to AGU house styles, and compliance with open data/code deposition policies.