Skill UI

This comprehensive skill guides users through the submission process for 'Management Review.' It helps assess whether a manuscript's theoretical contribution, methodology, and contextual fit align with the journal's scope (e.g., strategic management, organizational behavior, digital transformation). It provides detailed structural requirements, formatting rules (like anonymity, citation styles), and proactively highlights common rejection pitfalls, optimizing the paper for the target academic venue.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for publication in the ACM Digital Library. This process covers de-anonymization (restoring author details, funding, and public links), applying the strict double-column format, adhering to page budgets, incorporating all results promised during the rebuttal, and finalizing necessary metadata and conference artifacts.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting *Modern Economic Research*, a top-tier journal focused on comprehensive economic theory. It outlines the journal's academic scope, including industrial policy, digital economy, and regional reform. The guide emphasizes the need for manuscripts to possess strong institutional logic, verifiable evidence, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the work transcends mere policy reports.

This framework guides researchers in transforming platform-specific findings into abstract, portable concepts or functional mechanisms. It moves beyond mere correlation by helping define the scope, definition, and underlying process (mechanism) of a digital-media phenomenon, making the argument applicable to different contexts and technologies.

This guide provides a framework for assessing whether a research topic is suitable for interdisciplinary journals focusing on digital media and society (like NM&S). It details a four-part fit test, ensuring the research has social stakes, a portable concept, interdisciplinary reach, and enduring relevance beyond the news cycle. It helps researchers reframe narrow case studies into broadly applicable scholarly arguments.

This guide assists in the rigorous development of theoretical frameworks for Organization Science manuscripts. It details the two legitimate modes—deductive (a priori) or inductive (grounded)—and emphasizes the critical need to identify the core organizational mechanism, specify the levels of analysis (micro, meso, macro), and articulate cross-level bridging logic and boundary conditions. It guides users beyond simple literature reviews to build genuine, testable theory.

This tool guides the accurate invocation of the `ov skills` command group for managing the entire skill lifecycle on OpenViking. It supports adding skills from local directories, Git repositories, or GitHub URLs, and provides commands for listing, searching, updating, removing, and validating skill formats. Use it when an agent needs to automate skill deployment or discover available capabilities.

This guide details the meticulous process of converting an accepted PLDI conference paper into a formal PACMPL journal article. It covers crucial steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details, ORCIDs), adopting journal formatting standards, handling digital artifacts on Zenodo, managing open-access rights, and coordinating the three distinct deliverables: the article, the artifact, and the presentation talk.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for authors targeting top-tier academic conferences. This skill helps ensure strict adherence to technical standards, including ACM formatting (acmsmall) and page limits. It is crucial for verifying double-blind anonymity by detecting identity leaks (e.g., GitHub names, metadata) and confirming compliance with policies like dual-submission rules, thereby preventing summary rejection.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous academic peer review process, exemplified by top-tier Recommender Systems conferences (RecSys). It details the double-blind review mechanics, key evaluation criteria (novelty, validity, reproducibility), the critical rebuttal phase, and the requirements for final publication in ACM Digital Library. Essential for researchers and students aiming to improve academic submission quality.

This specialized tool analyzes Git diffs against a stated development intent to detect scope creep. It identifies overly broad pull requests, unrelated files, dependency additions, public API renames, or configuration changes. It guides users on whether changes should be kept, split into separate commits, or if the connection requires explicit justification, ensuring clean and focused code merges.

This guide details the critical steps and changes required to transform a reviewed SIGIR submission into the final Version of Record published via ACM Digital Library. It covers technical requirements, metadata standardization (CCS, keywords), conflict resolution, and adhering to publishing timelines and copyright protocols (e-rights, TAPS).