Skill UI

Interactive guidance that evaluates SaaS growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency together so leaders can surface red flags, prioritize fixes, and prepare board or investor reviews.

A comprehensive guide for rigorous causal inference in health policy research. It details advanced econometric methodologies—including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Instrumental Variables (IV)—and addresses critical issues like selection bias and institutional realism. This resource helps ensure that empirical claims meet the highest standards required by top-tier health economics journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to health economics journals, focusing on pre-submission pre-mortem analysis. It teaches how to anticipate specific, expert-level critiques—such as selection bias, concurrent confounding, or econometric limitations—and proactively structure the manuscript to neutralize these objections before they are raised by reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for assembling reproducible research packages using restricted health data, such as Medicare claims or EHR data. This package focuses not on running the analysis, but on establishing a credible data access path, creating detailed Data Availability Statements (DAS), and ensuring code is shared and reproducible, which is crucial for publishing in health economics journals.

Provides a comprehensive framework for conducting and reporting robustness checks in health economics studies. It guides authors to organize findings by addressing specific threats to the core claim (e.g., selection bias, concurrent policy changes, measurement error) rather than simply appending multiple specifications. Essential for ensuring results are stable and defensible for top-tier journal submissions.

A comprehensive preflight guide for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Health Economics (JHE) via Elsevier Editorial Manager. This checklist ensures compliance with specific journal requirements, covering single-anonymization, data availability statements, keyword formatting, and required declarations (e.g., funding, AI usage). Use it as the final check before pressing submit.

A comprehensive guide detailing best practices for constructing rigorous and legible tables and figures for health economics manuscripts, particularly for the Journal of Health Economics (JHE). It covers presentation requirements for main policy estimates, identification figures (e.g., event studies, RD plots), and descriptive institutional exhibits, ensuring that the health setting and causal effects are immediately apparent to expert readers.

A comprehensive guide for constructing and applying structural models in health economics, particularly for interpreting empirical estimates or running policy counterfactuals. It covers core archetypes—including demand-selection, provider incentives, and human capital—and emphasizes critical rigor, such as parameter identification, adherence to institutional rules (e.g., risk adjustment), and defending policy-invariance (Lucas critique).

This guide provides a rigorous framework for researchers to determine if their work constitutes a genuine health-economics contribution for a specialized journal like JHE. It moves beyond simply having health data, instead focusing on whether the core economic mechanism relates to insurance design, provider incentives, market structure, or health behaviors. It helps refine the research question and position the paper against other related fields.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of writing and submitting a manuscript for the Journal of Health Economics (JHE). It identifies the optimal next step—from initial topic selection and causal design establishment to literature positioning, robustness testing, and handling referee revisions (R&R). It ensures the paper meets the rigorous standards of health economics, guaranteeing a structured, step-by-step approach for maximum publication success.

This style guide helps authors structure and write manuscripts for health economics journals, specifically addressing the unique needs of specialist reviewers. It focuses on ensuring the policy relevance, the empirical contribution, and the institutional grounding of the research are immediately clear, particularly in the abstract and introduction.

This tool guides researchers on whether their academic topic aligns with the scope of an empirical microeconomics journal, specifically the Journal of Human Resources (JHR). It emphasizes that the research must focus on policy-relevant, causal questions in core fields (e.g., labor, health, education), strictly differentiating it from purely organizational behavior or 'HR management' studies. It serves as a critical gatekeeper before formal submission.