Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for crafting high-impact academic manuscripts, specifically addressing the predictable and rigorous critiques of top-tier journals. It teaches authors how to pre-emptively answer common spatial econometric, identification, and theoretical objections (e.g., spatial sorting, spillovers, scale issues) directly within the text, ensuring the paper is robust and credible before submission.

This comprehensive suite provides systematic checks to ensure spatial estimates are robust against methodological choices. It addresses core econometric issues such as Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP), boundary arbitrariness, spatial sorting, and spillover effects. Use this guide when submitting research to high-impact journals (like JUE) to demonstrate the reliability and stability of spatial relationships.

This router guides authors through the rigorous, theory-first pipeline required for mathematical finance manuscripts. It helps determine the current stage (e.g., topic selection, proof architecture, contribution framing, revision) and identifies the critical bottleneck, ensuring the paper meets the high standards of major academic journals. Useful for starting new papers or troubleshooting mid-project issues.

Provides rigorous guidelines for structuring and writing high-quality academic literature reviews, specifically tailored for journals like Management World. It mandates a unique three-layer dialogue structure (international context, local Chinese research, and original contribution), addressing issues like language source imbalance or lack of scholarly dialogue. Covers precise ratios for Chinese and English sources, and integration with national policy narratives.

This comprehensive guide outlines the necessary steps and artifacts required for submitting a camera-ready version of an accepted NeurIPS paper. It covers de-anonymization, updating metadata, resolving final content issues, and ensuring all public-facing elements meet official guidelines.

This skill simulates the rigorous peer review process used in top-tier AI and machine learning conferences (like NeurIPS). It helps users diagnose potential weaknesses in a submission regarding quality, clarity, significance, ethical compliance, and reproducibility. It guides the identification of decision-relevant issues that ACs and reviewers are likely to raise, helping authors strategically plan responses for revision.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for ethical handling, data transparency, and documentation in New Media & Society research. It covers crucial issues like informed consent, anonymization best practices, scraping legal constraints (ToS), and methods for making qualitative or computational claims credible, ensuring responsible data sharing and academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide to help researchers pressure-test if their project aligns with the scope of Population and Development Review (PDR). It teaches how to frame research by connecting demographic processes (e.g., fertility, aging) to broader social, economic, or environmental development issues, ensuring the contribution has broad policy interest beyond narrow estimation.

A comprehensive skill designed to help users assess the suitability of their economics or management manuscript for 'Research on Financial and Economic Issues'. It provides detailed guidelines on journal positioning, submission requirements, thematic preferences, and common rejection pitfalls, ensuring authors align their work with the journal's scope and style.

This strategy guides researchers in anticipating the specific, rigorous methodological objections raised by top-tier academic referees, especially in applied econometrics. It provides a systematic map connecting econometric designs (like DID, IV, RD) to common threats (e.g., measurement error, bias, specification issues). Users can pre-empt these criticisms by structuring their manuscript to include necessary defenses, robustness checks, and scope limitations before formal submission.

This guide helps researchers understand the rigorous standards for publishing in the highly prestigious and cross-disciplinary journal, Social Sciences in China. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be theoretical depth, addressing major societal issues, and developing original concepts, rather than merely demonstrating advanced empirical techniques or niche findings.

This guide provides a structured framework for academics to elevate their research topics. It instructs authors on transforming narrow empirical questions into major theoretical and institutional debates, connecting research to core societal issues (China, World, Era). It emphasizes moving beyond simple policy assessment to address structural contradictions and theoretical gaps, suitable for advanced academic writing.