Skill UI

Create truthful, accessible, publication-ready scientific figures using Matplotlib, Seaborn, or Plotly. Ensures data integrity, proper encoding, accessibility compliance, and journal export planning for research publications. Includes guidelines for uncertainty displays, color/contrast review, and metadata validation.

This advanced skill is designed to generate high-quality, publication-ready academic illustrations and diagrams. It utilizes a sophisticated, multi-stage iterative workflow involving Claude for planning, layout optimization, and strict visual review, combined with a dedicated local Codex app-server bridge for native image rendering. The process ensures that generated figures meet the rigorous aesthetic and structural standards required for top-tier conferences and journals (e.g., CVPR, NeurIPS).

This skill simulates a comprehensive international journal peer review process by dynamically configuring a 5-seat review panel. It includes a Journal-Fit Reviewer, three peer-review roles, and a Devil's Advocate to challenge core arguments. The system automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology, then generates five role-separated review reports followed by a structured Editorial Decision Letter and Revision Roadmap. It supports various modes including full review, re-review, quick assessment, and reviewer calibration, handling inputs in multiple languages.

This advanced trading journal captures the full context of a trade, recording not only the fill price and P&L, but also the initial thesis, the defined plan (stop/target), and the emotional state at the time of entry. It integrates with Notion to log and review trades, grading the quality of decisions and execution against the user's own plan, ensuring users learn from process, not just profit.

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer reviewer feedback and revision comments for top-tier academic journals. It teaches structured rebuttal writing, handling disagreements while maintaining professionalism, and managing multi-round revisions to systematically increase publication probability.

A comprehensive guide for designing and presenting rigorous experiments and simulations for top-tier journals in Control Theory, Robotics, and Smart Systems. Covers RQ-driven design, establishing fair baselines, providing theoretical proofs of stability/convergence, performing ablation studies, and ensuring statistical significance, helping authors build an undeniable evidence chain for double-blind external review.

A comprehensive guide on writing literature reviews and related work sections, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It teaches authors how to frame their research by focusing on the incremental contribution (delta), moving beyond simple literature listing to establish clear gaps, contrasting current limitations, and rigorously defining the work's novelty in a structured manner.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

This skill is a specialized tool designed for scholars to assess the suitability and scope of their academic review article against the rigorous standards of top-tier management journals, such as Academy of Management Annals (AMA). It helps determine if a manuscript is merely a summary, or if it possesses the necessary synthesis, new organizing framework, and credible future research agenda required for publication in a highly selective venue.

This tool guides authors to assess whether their management or organizational research manuscript is suitable for the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It focuses on the journal's pure-theory nature, providing detailed checks on conceptual novelty, logical rigor, structural requirements, and identifying potential desk-reject risks for non-empirical, theory-building papers.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting to Accounts of Chemical Research (ACS). It helps researchers understand the journal's unique niche: publishing concise, first-person, narrative accounts of a research program's evolution, rather than comprehensive field reviews or primary data reports. It serves as a fit-checking tool, guiding manuscript framing, required evidence, and house style.