Skill UI

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers determine the optimal conference or journal venue (e.g., AAMAS, NeurIPS, ICML, EC) for multi-agent AI research. It emphasizes that the contribution must center on the interaction result—such as mechanism design, coordination, or negotiation—rather than simply applying a single-agent method in a multiagent testbed. This tool sharpens the research framing before writing begins.

This skill guides authors on positioning their research for the ACM International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI). It functions as a venue-selection and re-framing tool, helping authors structure manuscripts (moving from general CS/journal style to a specialized tangible interaction narrative). It covers scope fit, evidence requirements, and distinguishing TEI from similar HCI conferences.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS). This skill helps determine manuscript fit, provides strategies for re-framing work from other disciplines (e.g., journal or arXiv style), and details the required evidence (e.g., community-grounded framing, ethical evaluation) needed to succeed in this specialized venue. Use it for venue selection, scope calibration, and submission readiness checks for accessible technology research.

This guide helps researchers elevate general empirical ideas (e.g., 'X affects Y') into rigorous, theory-driven accounting contributions. It outlines four sources of academic contribution, identifies key areas (auditing, financial accounting, governance), and teaches how to anchor research in specific accounting mechanisms and China's institutional context, meeting the standards of top-tier accounting journals.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide to submitting primary research in catalysis to ACS Catalysis. It helps authors assess whether their work meets the journal's high standards, which require an interlocking case of activity/selectivity data, advanced characterization, and robust mechanistic insight. Use it for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and understanding the rigorous evidence bar expected in modern catalysis research (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electro-, etc.).

This guide provides a comprehensive, advanced strategy for academic researchers writing microeconometric papers for top-tier journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It teaches authors how to anticipate sophisticated, technical objections from expert referees (such as issues with causal inference design, selection bias, or parallel trends). The focus is on pre-empting these objections by integrating solutions directly into the manuscript text, rather than waiting for a formal revision letter.

This guide helps researchers strategically assess whether their empirical microeconomics project is best suited for the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). It provides a structured framework to test the project's causal design, scope, and cross-field appeal, ensuring the question is 'AEJ: Applied-shaped' rather than being too general (AER) or too specialized (Field Journal).

A comprehensive workflow router designed for authors submitting manuscripts to the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). This skill guides the user through every stage of the academic writing process—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to causal identification, robustness checks, polishing, data replication package preparation, and final submission/rebuttal. It acts as a navigational guide, ensuring all critical steps required by top-tier economics journals are addressed in the correct sequence.

A comprehensive guide to assessing the fit of a macroeconomics research paper for top-tier journals, particularly the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It helps researchers determine if their work possesses the required broad interest, quantitative discipline, and policy relevance to succeed at AEJ: Macro, versus more specialized venues like AER, JME, or RED. This framework guides strategic academic writing.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It guides the researcher through the entire publication lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning, through rigorous quantitative modeling (DSGE, SVAR), empirical identification, writing, to final submission and rebuttal strategy. It ensures the final paper meets the high standards of modern macroeconomics research.

This guide helps researchers determine if their microeconomic theory, model, or experiment is suitable for American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It provides a structured framework for evaluating the contribution's scope, assessing broad microeconomic interest, and differentiating the appropriate venue from competing specialist journals like JET, Econometrica, or AEJ: Applied.