Skill UI

Provides LaTeX templates, formatting rules, and submission guidance covering journals (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI, etc.), posters, and grants so researchers can prepare compliant manuscripts efficiently.

Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts and reports with rigorous evidence provenance, authorship accountability, and confidentiality controls. This tool ensures every factual claim is traceable to verified evidence, making it essential for high-stakes academic writing, journal submissions, and regulated research reporting where accuracy and compliance are non-negotiable.

Prepare journal papers, conference submissions, posters, and grant documents with venue-specific formatting guidance, official template checks, and LaTeX scaffolds for drafting and compliance review.

This advanced agent simulates a rigorous, multi-perspective peer review process for academic manuscripts, mimicking the standards of an international journal. It dynamically deploys a team of five specialized reviewers—including an Editor-in-Chief, three domain experts, and a Devil's Advocate—to critically evaluate methodology, domain fit, originality, and core arguments. It supports full submission review, revision verification, and reviewer calibration, providing a structured editorial decision and comprehensive revision roadmap.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed to guide authors through the rigorous preparation process for submitting academic manuscripts to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It covers critical steps such as adopting double-blind anonymity, mandatory author commitment forms, ensuring originality, and meeting the high formatting standards required for top-tier publications in control and automation theory.

This advanced skill provides a rigorous framework for assessing whether an organizational or management research manuscript is suitable for highly selective, theory-driven journals like the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It guides authors on necessary theoretical framing, methodological rigor (e.g., endogeneity, causal inference), structural improvements, and common pitfalls to avoid, significantly improving submission quality and maximizing acceptance chances.

This tool guides authors to assess whether their management or organizational research manuscript is suitable for the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It focuses on the journal's pure-theory nature, providing detailed checks on conceptual novelty, logical rigor, structural requirements, and identifying potential desk-reject risks for non-empirical, theory-building papers.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers aiming to submit papers to the top accounting journal, *Accounting Research*. This skill helps authors identify if their research focus aligns with core accounting mechanisms, such as disclosure quality, auditing standards, and regulatory changes, distinguishing it from general corporate finance or economics.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting to Accounts of Chemical Research (ACS). It helps researchers understand the journal's unique niche: publishing concise, first-person, narrative accounts of a research program's evolution, rather than comprehensive field reviews or primary data reports. It serves as a fit-checking tool, guiding manuscript framing, required evidence, and house style.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for positioning networking research for the ACM CoNEXT conference. It helps authors assess the manuscript's fit, structure the paper for optimal impact, and ensure the evidence (measurement, prototype, protocol) meets the rigorous standards of top-tier CS venues. Use this tool when re-framing journal-style or arXiv papers for conference submission.

This skill is a comprehensive strategic guide for authors targeting the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). It helps assess the fit of a manuscript, guides the re-framing of work from journal or arXiv styles into a specialized conference narrative, and outlines specific requirements for evidence, evaluation (including offline metrics, user context, and leakage-aware methods), and contribution framing necessary for top-tier CS venues.