Skill UI

A comprehensive audit checklist for preparing research submissions for FSE. This guide covers critical steps including meeting two-stage deadlines (registration and submission), adhering to strict ACM formatting and page budgets, ensuring heavy double-anonymous anonymity by scrubbing all metadata leaks, and fulfilling open science requirements with Data Availability statements. Essential for authors ensuring their manuscript meets high academic standards.

This guide outlines the mandatory open data and code requirements for publishing in Global Change Biology (GCB). It details that primary and secondary data, along with supporting code/software, must be archived in public, DOI-minting repositories (e.g., Dryad, Zenodo) prior to acceptance. It emphasizes that 'available on request' is not accepted and provides a structured checklist for ensuring reproducibility and proper metadata submission.

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors submitting manuscripts to Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne. It ensures compliance with critical publisher requirements, helping authors avoid common desk-rejection reasons. The checklist verifies scope fit, adherence to word/abstract limits, the inclusion of mandatory graphical abstracts, and proper data availability statements (requiring DOIs).

This guide assists authors planning to submit to Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) by detailing best practices for data and code sharing. It clarifies that while data deposition is strongly encouraged for reproducibility, it is not a mandatory requirement. It outlines what to prepare, including raw data, analysis scripts, experimental instructions, and proper availability statements.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts via major publisher systems (e.g., Elsevier). It guides authors through crucial final checks, including double-anonymization, format adherence (Highlights, Abstract), ORCID requirements, and preparing the Data Availability Statement, ensuring the manuscript is fully compliant before submission.

This guide provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting academic manuscripts to major journals (e.g., Wiley/Governance). It ensures compliance with critical submission requirements, including double-blind anonymization, strict word count limits, abstract length, Data Availability Statements, and adherence to specific scholarly scopes. Use this before hitting submit to minimize desk rejection risks and submission errors.

This guide instructs authors on creating mandatory Data Availability Statements and building comprehensive replication materials for academic manuscripts. It covers best practices for data provenance, code management, and handling restricted data, ensuring research integrity and reproducibility.

This comprehensive guide walks authors through the rigorous, post-acceptance editing process typical of top-tier scholarly journals, such as Harvard Law Review. It covers key stages: defending substantive arguments, enforcing technical style (Bluebook), and performing the critical source-pull/cite-check, ensuring every citation is verifiable. It focuses on collaborative relationship management and timely execution.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide to elevating academic legal writing to the rigorous standard of a Harvard Law Review (HLR). It focuses on structural discipline, including crafting compelling introductions (problem, claim, stakes, roadmap), maintaining the distinct text-vs-footnote division of labor, and adopting a plain, formal, and active prose style for maximum readability by generalist scholars.

This guide helps researchers structure their academic arguments for Human Resource Management (HRM) journals. It mandates articulating a dual contribution: a rigorous scholarly advance (theoretical, empirical, or methodological) AND a clear, actionable implication for workforce policy or HRM practice. Mastering this framing is crucial to avoid being labeled as 'incremental' research.

This comprehensive guide provides a mandatory preflight checklist for authors submitting scholarly manuscripts to academic journals. It covers critical requirements including double-blind anonymization, maintaining APA style, data availability statements, and passing the Editor-in-Chief's fit-and-relevance screen. Use this checklist before submitting to maximize acceptance chances and ensure publication readiness.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for top-tier data mining conferences (e.g., ICDM). It emphasizes the critical strategy of preemptively addressing potential weaknesses—such as baselines, variance, scaling, and data leakage—directly within the submitted manuscript, as author rebuttals are often not permitted. Also provides strict guidelines for drafting anonymous, high-impact responses if a rebuttal window is available.