Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors writing the Related Work section for high-impact journals (e.g., Acta Electronica Sinica). It teaches how to structure the review critically, moving beyond mere chronology to organize by technical path, defining scope, articulating clear technical deficiencies, and precisely positioning the paper's novelty against state-of-the-art methods.

This guide teaches the unique, high-level writing style required for scholarly reviews, particularly in management science. It moves beyond simple description to crafting an authoritative, integrative, and agenda-setting argument. Learn how to structure a problem-first opening, articulate a clear critical position, and provide a future research roadmap, transforming a mere summary into a scholarly contribution.

This guide provides a rigorous, step-by-step framework for developing robust academic theories, particularly for prestigious journals like the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It shifts the focus from simple assertions to a structured argument by requiring explicit definition of constructs (including domain and scope), stating underlying assumptions, specifying relationship forms (e.g., mediating, causal), articulating the mechanism (the 'why'), and formulating falsifiable, numbered propositions. Mastering this process ensures the theory is comprehensive and academically sound.

This skill guide teaches the specialized rhetorical and structural requirements for writing comprehensive academic reviews, particularly for high-impact fields like Sociology. It ensures the prose is authoritative, highly accessible to non-specialists, logically signposted, and culminates in a concrete, forward-looking research agenda, moving beyond simple summary.

This guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process used by major art history journals. It helps authors understand what expert referees and editors focus on—such as the originality of the argument, close visual analysis, and documentary evidence—to pre-empt common objections and significantly improve manuscript quality before submission. It emphasizes mastering academic standards and anonymity protocols.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complete academic review pipeline for IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering (ASE) submissions. It explains unique stages like the early-rejection gate, the criteria-bound revision process, and the difference between ASE's cycle and those of peer conferences (e.g., ICSE, FSE). Essential reading for authors aiming to submit high-quality research in automatic software engineering.

This guide outlines the critical rules for structuring technical research papers submitted to top-tier conferences like ASE. It emphasizes the 'decision-criticality' rule, instructing authors on how to separate core arguments (which must fit within the 10-page body) from reproduction details, raw logs, and supplementary material (the artifact). Mastering this separation is crucial for ensuring reviewers judge the paper on its merits, not its supplementary data.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers for the ACM CHI conference. It provides detailed instructions on structuring explicit contribution statements, calibrating claims, ethically handling participant quotes, and ensuring accessibility for mixed-expertise review juries. Essential for those submitting research in HCI and related fields.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising academic manuscripts for top-tier scholarly journals. It provides a structured strategy for authors to respond to editor and reviewer feedback, emphasizing strengthening the central intervention, addressing every comment point-by-point, and reconciling conflicting scholarly opinions while maintaining academic rigor.

A comprehensive methodological guide for conducting exhaustive robustness checks in academic economics manuscripts, particularly for journals requiring high empirical rigor. It provides an exhaustive checklist covering variable replacement, sample window manipulation, advanced identification strategies (like PSM-DID and placebo tests), and crucially, systematically ruling out alternative explanations and confounding factors. Mastering this process is essential for defending research findings against rigorous peer review.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with detailed standards for preparing high-quality, publishable scientific manuscripts for the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It covers critical academic elements, including writing the four-element reporting abstract, structuring the narrative (Introduction, Methods, Experiments), maintaining consistent terminology and symbols, adhering to Chinese legislative units, and mastering the GB/T 7714 citation format. It ensures the final submission meets the rigorous linguistic and structural demands of top-tier academic journals.