Skill UI

This skill guides authors on strategically positioning their AI/ML manuscripts for the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). It provides deep insights into the conference's scope, required contribution framing (e.g., algorithm, system, theorem), evidence standards, and how to tailor the narrative for a general European AI readership. Use it when targeting ECAI or needing to refine a paper from a journal or arXiv style into a selective conference submission.

This skill provides a strategic guide for authors evaluating if their AI/data mining manuscript is a suitable fit for the ECML PKDD conference. It covers scope definition, evidence requirements, academic framing, and strategic positioning relative to major global venues (e.g., ICML, NeurIPS). Use this to refine your submission narrative and maximize your chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting systems papers to the EuroSys conference. It helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript, frame the narrative, and determine the required evidence depth (including implementation artifacts and realistic workloads). The guide specifically covers European systems research in OS, distributed systems, cloud, and security, while providing comparisons to related top-tier venues like SOSP and OSDI.

This comprehensive guide provides structural and stylistic advice for authors submitting experimental economics manuscripts. It emphasizes adopting a 'design-forward' narrative, ensuring procedural transparency, quantifying results in subjects' units, and meticulously structuring the core design section to meet the high standards of expert reviewers.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their manuscript is suitable for the Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) conference. It covers the specific scope fit, required evidence standards (including threat models and economic context), and best practices for re-framing general CS research into a finance/security-focused narrative, ensuring the paper meets the expectations of the specialized review community.

A comprehensive guide to assessing manuscript suitability for 'Financial Regulation Research.' It outlines the journal's scope (systemic risk, macroprudential policy, financial technology), required academic structure, acceptable methodologies (DID, VAR, etc.), and common pitfalls to avoid. Use this tool to refine your paper's narrative and ensure alignment with niche academic standards.

This guide provides rigorous instructions on developing the theoretical and analytical framework for Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscripts. It instructs researchers on how to define complex, contested concepts (like resilience, vulnerability, and governance), specify causal mechanisms, and establish testable relationships. The goal is to elevate the paper from descriptive narrative to a load-bearing, interdisciplinary contribution.

This skill polishes scholarly prose for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations and social science. It focuses on elevating the writing from technically correct but flat drafts to a theoretically engaged, highly readable, and narratively compelling register. It guides users on structuring the argument (puzzle to generativity), refining prose (cutting nominalizations, using process voice), and adhering to strict academic constraints (abstract length, word caps, anonymity).

A comprehensive guide for revising technical manuscripts intended for premier data mining conferences like ICDM. It teaches authors to shift focus from model-centric claims to data-regime-first narratives, emphasizing measurable evidence, mechanistic detail, and adhering to strict academic constraints (e.g., triple-blind format, page limits).

A comprehensive guide for structuring and polishing scholarly review articles for a broad academic audience. It ensures the writing adopts an authoritative, highly accessible, and forward-looking narrative arc, guiding the author to move beyond mere summary and establish a clear research agenda.

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

A comprehensive style guide for structuring and refining robotics research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like ICRA. It dictates moving from technique-speak to task-first narratives, emphasizing figure-first presentation, rigorous quantification of claims, and adhering to strict page budgets to maximize reviewer impact and clarity.