Skill UI

This guide provides rigorous standards for polishing scientific prose for high-impact materials journals. It focuses on improving narrative flow by emphasizing the structure-property-function argument, enforcing concision, standardizing materials nomenclature and units (SI), and eliminating hype-word inflation. Ideal for authors needing to transition a raw scientific draft into a polished, publishable manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising short-format academic manuscripts for high-impact journals like the American Economic Review: Insights. It enforces strict structural constraints, requiring authors to state the headline result immediately, adhere to tight word caps (e.g., 7,000 words), and structure the narrative to maximize impact and minimize unnecessary detail.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for structuring appendices and supplementary materials for high-level academic journals. It helps authors manage the balance between main text conciseness and academic completeness by clearly defining what belongs in the core narrative (main findings) versus what should be reserved for the supplementary section (detailed proofs, extended experiments, raw data, and multimedia).

This skill provides architectural guidance for writing high-level academic history articles, specifically tailored for the American Historical Review (AHR). It helps writers ensure that the narrative development and the core historical argument are seamlessly interwoven, adhering to strict length and scholarly standards. Use it when outlining complex drafts or restructuring material that feels disjointed.

This skill is designed to polish and refine academic manuscripts intended for the American Historical Review (AHR). It focuses on enhancing the clarity, narrative flow, and authoritative voice of the prose, ensuring the work is accessible and engaging for historians across all subfields. It tightens the overall readability, minimizes unnecessary jargon, and helps frame evidence without altering the core arguments or academic content.

This framework provides a rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and comprehensive academic syntheses. It guides researchers through building transparent coverage, designing robust coding matrices, and choosing the correct integration method (narrative, systematic, or bibliometric) to move beyond simple summarization and create an auditable intellectual map of a field.

This tool provides comprehensive, late-stage polish for full-manuscript academic prose, specifically tailored for top-tier journals (e.g., AMJ). It focuses on transforming dense, jargon-heavy text into rigorous yet highly readable narratives. Key functions include front-loading the core argument, enforcing active voice, refining structural flow (Introduction to Discussion arc), ensuring consistent terminology, and adhering strictly to required academic house styles and formatting standards. It improves clarity and rhetorical impact without altering the theoretical contribution or data analy...

This guide helps researchers determine if their empirical economic manuscript is suitable for submission to AEJ: Economic Policy. It focuses on transforming a clean empirical finding into a policy-driven narrative by identifying a concrete policy lever, stating a clear policy question, and quantifying the welfare or cost-benefit implications.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for refining academic prose specifically for major psychology review publications. It teaches authors how to achieve an authoritative yet accessible voice, shifting the focus from merely listing studies to constructing a deep, argumentative narrative (the 'spine'). It is crucial for structuring abstracts, introductions, and future-directions sections to engage both specialists and general psychology readers.

This comprehensive guide helps computer vision researchers strategically position their work for the Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV). It covers how to evaluate manuscript fit, restructure the narrative from general to conference-specific, optimize evidence presentation (including ablations and failure modes), and understand ACCV's regional niche compared to global flagships like CVPR or ECCV.

This guide provides detailed instructions for elevating academic prose from standard "lab-report" style to the sophisticated narrative craft expected by top-tier journals. It covers structuring the argument, maintaining theoretical focus, refining voice (process vs. variance), and perfecting the narrative arc to ensure the work reads as a compelling intellectual story, not just a collection of findings. Use this when your theory and analysis are settled, but the writing feels flat or dense.

This guide details the specific structure and rigor required for writing systems papers for top-tier academic conferences like ATC. It emphasizes the need for a self-standing, two-page abstract (Round One) and a full-paper narrative that is purely implementation and measurement driven. Key principles include quantifying costs alongside gains, structuring the narrative from problem to impact, and rigorously supporting claims with real-world evidence.