Skill UI

This framework guides the creation of high-impact academic literature reviews, transforming a mere annotated bibliography into a cohesive, argumentative essay. It helps researchers impose a unifying 'spine'—such as a taxonomy, process model, or levels of analysis—to make complex psychological fields legible and accessible to non-specialist readers. Ideal for synthesizing scattered research into a single, powerful argument.

This framework guides researchers on how to elevate an academic literature review from a mere annotated bibliography into a cohesive, argumentative piece. It teaches authors to impose a central 'spine'—such as a taxonomy, causal mechanism, or set of analytical levels—to structure the subfield's existing work, thereby generating new insights and defining the field's future agenda. Essential for advanced academic writing and synthesizing large bodies of research.

A structural guide for authors writing for top-tier organizational theory journals, such as ASQ. It teaches how to elevate the literature review from a simple annotated list to an explicit, argumentative entry that names a specific scholarly conversation, identifies a theoretical tension, and sharply defines the paper's unique contribution. This is crucial for passing peer review.

This skill guides the polishing of academic manuscripts for high-level sociology journals like ASR. It ensures the writing is readable by a general sociologist outside the subfield, adheres strictly to the ASA Style Guide, and manages strict word caps (e.g., 15,000 words total, 200-word abstract). It focuses on clarity, structure, and adherence to formatting rules rather than generating new content.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for evaluating Electronic Design Automation (EDA) research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like DAC. It emphasizes the necessity of using standard, recognized benchmark suites (e.g., ISPD, EPFL, TAU), comparing results against the true State-of-the-Art (SOTA), reporting full PPA metrics and runtime, and implementing ablation studies to ensure fairness, reproducibility, and generalizability, especially for ML-based methods.

This skill provides a comprehensive review pass for econometric theory manuscripts. It guides authors in polishing prose, ensuring rigorous theorem-proof clarity, standardizing notation, and enforcing adherence to specific academic journal formatting guidelines (e.g., APA style, 11pt font, abstract length, running head). It is essential for generating highly rigorous and publication-ready academic submissions.

A comprehensive project management guide for preparing and submitting advanced NLP conference papers to EMNLP. It details the entire research lifecycle, including backward planning from ARR deadlines, managing data annotation timelines, coordinating team roles, and making strategic decisions (commit, revise, withdraw) to ensure successful submission.

Genomic Intelligence provides powerful, hosted transformer models for advanced genomic analysis. Users can input a DNA/FASTA sequence and receive structured predictions for key regulatory features, including promoter regions, splice sites, enhancer activity, chromatin state, gene expression (log TPM), and de-novo gene annotation. This service operates via a REST API or MCP server, eliminating the need for local GPU hardware or model weights, making complex bioinformatics accessible through sequence input.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure the 'Related Work' section for submissions to top data mining conferences like ICDM. It emphasizes positioning the research based on core mechanisms and mining tasks, rather than simply listing results. The guide also provides critical advice on maintaining triple-blind anonymity, verifying citation venues (avoiding misattribution traps), and ensuring the novelty claim is distilled into a single, quotable mechanism-contrast sentence.

A comprehensive guide for structuring empirical exhibits (tables and figures) for Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscripts. It addresses the strict page budget (32 text / 38 total) by teaching authors how to differentiate between core arguments that belong in the main body and supporting details that must be moved to the electronic companion/online appendix, ensuring all exhibits are self-contained and highly readable.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and justifying behavioral or bounded-rationality models for high-impact academic journals. It helps researchers 'right-size' their theory, ensuring that models generate sharp, testable predictions and explicitly define behavioral primitives, moving beyond mere notation to true empirical insight.

This framework guides the creation of a structured, argumentative literature review, preventing the writing from becoming a mere annotated bibliography. By imposing a unifying taxonomy, model, or question sequence, the author transforms scattered research into a cohesive argument about the field. It helps define the 'spine' of the survey, identifies knowledge gaps, and reconciles apparent contradictions in existing literature.