Skill UI

This guide provides late-stage polishing for academic manuscripts, specifically targeting the Academy of Management Review (AMR) house style. It helps transform drafts that read like literature reviews or essays into tightly structured, argument-driven theoretical pieces. Key focus areas include establishing a clear theoretical puzzle in the introduction, maintaining continuous argumentative flow, ensuring precise definition of constructs, and articulating propositions without using hypothesis language. It is crucial for authors who need to refine their prose and structure before final subm...

This guide serves as a comprehensive router for authors preparing an invited review article for the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych). It outlines the systematic, multi-stage process, guiding authors through topic selection, literature synthesis, framework development, writing style refinement, and final submission/revision, ensuring the final piece is authoritative and comprehensive.

This framework guides researchers on how to elevate an academic literature review from a mere annotated bibliography into a cohesive, argumentative piece. It teaches authors to impose a central 'spine'—such as a taxonomy, causal mechanism, or set of analytical levels—to structure the subfield's existing work, thereby generating new insights and defining the field's future agenda. Essential for advanced academic writing and synthesizing large bodies of research.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

This skill reconstructs the full narrative behind a piece of code by analyzing local Git history. Instead of just naming the last author (like git blame), it traces the file's origin, tracks subsequent changes, identifies related companion files, and extracts intent clues from commit messages. Use this when you need to know *why* code exists before refactoring, making risky edits, or understanding complex system behavior.

This guide outlines comprehensive standards for creating self-contained, reproducible, and highly professional tables and figures for top-tier academic journals. It covers best practices for econometric reporting, including Monte Carlo error presentation, consistent precision, adhering to booktabs style, and ensuring every piece of data is traceable back to a fixed script and seed.

A comprehensive guide detailing the critical workflow from paper acceptance to final camera-ready submission for major computational conferences (like ICCV). It covers technical requirements such as de-anonymization, synchronizing multiple public copies (arXiv, CVF, IEEE), updating URLs, and managing logistical details for presentation.

This framework guides researchers on how to rigorously position their academic contribution, particularly for top-tier journals like JMR. It mandates defining novelty across three critical axes—substantive phenomena, methodological models, and theoretical mechanisms—and explicitly distinguishing the work from the single closest piece of existing literature to ensure the contribution is framed as a genuine advance.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for writing and refining technical papers for the Journal of Software (JOS). It covers structuring the abstract, mastering the introduction narrative arc, ensuring terminology consistency, and adhering to strict citation standards (GB/T 7714). Use this when submitting a draft to a Chinese academic journal, aiming to transform the manuscript into a highly polished, professional piece that meets the rigorous standards of the Chinese software engineering community.

This skill guides authors in determining if their academic work is best suited for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It assesses whether the piece is an authoritative, synthetic review essay, focusing on synthesizing existing knowledge and setting an academic agenda, rather than presenting new empirical results. It helps authors properly frame their contribution, understand the required structure, and navigate the specialized submission criteria for top-tier economic journals.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for submissions to the journal *Language* (LSA). It guides authors through the complex manuscript development process by identifying the appropriate piece type (e.g., General Research Article, Review Article) and routing them to the necessary specialized skills (e.g., theory building, literature positioning, data analysis). It helps authors structure their work and ensure theoretical depth and cross-subfield legibility.

This utility ensures that academic manuscripts adhere to specific journal house styles, such as the MIND Style. It handles complex citation mechanics, line numbering requirements for review copies, and the crucial process of anonymization for blind refereeing. Use it to audit your work's readiness for submission, guaranteeing consistency and compliance before the final draft.