Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors to articulate the unique and marginal contribution of their research within the highly specialized field of health economics. It teaches how to frame findings against canonical literature, identify specific gaps, and structure the argument to satisfy expert reviewers, ensuring the paper's novelty is clearly demonstrated.

This guide helps researchers structure and refine academic papers for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It provides a framework for separating core, decision-making content (main text) from supporting details (appendices/supplementary material), ensuring the manuscript remains scientifically rigorous yet adheres to strict length constraints (e.g., ~12000 characters). It teaches how to use a 'decisive three-question' standard.

This guide provides expert strategies for positioning academic research, particularly in urban economics. It teaches how to precisely articulate a manuscript's marginal contribution against established theoretical frontiers (e.g., agglomeration, spatial equilibrium, housing supply) and related canonical literature, ensuring the paper is clearly differentiated and compelling to expert referees.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting policy or management papers, detailing the required structure and depth for the institutional background section. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of major academic journals by providing a four-part framework, timeline requirements, and linking the policy context directly to the identification strategy.

This guide outlines the strategic process for authors responding to major or minor revisions (R&R) for academic journals, particularly in public administration. It teaches how to structure a diplomatic, point-by-point rebuttal letter that satisfies both expert reviewers and handling editors. Key strategies include reconciling conflicting demands, explicitly addressing every comment, and protecting the paper's core scholarly contribution and practical evidence.

This guide teaches how to structure the introduction of a scholarly paper to effectively position its unique contribution against the current academic frontier. Instead of writing a general literature review, it focuses on articulating the 'delta'—what the paper does that prior work could not—making the work highly visible to general-interest journal editors and referees.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to SIGMETRICS, detailing how to structure the Related Work section. It emphasizes shifting from a simple citation catalog to a 'delta-first' contrast, highlighting the specific technical novelty (e.g., tighter bounds, weaker assumptions) relative to existing literature across multiple performance evaluation lanes (systems, measurement, learning, etc.).

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for evaluating whether a research manuscript aligns with the scope, structure, and requirements of the journal *Soft Science*. It covers journal positioning, topic preferences, recommended writing structure, common rejection pitfalls, and strategic revision advice for academic papers focused on policy, regional development, and management decision-making.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors submitting papers to the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). This guide details the critical requirements, including the single-column 11-point format, the double-blind anonymity rules, the importance of the abstract, table of contents, and the first twelve pages (the 'reading contract'). It covers formatting, publication policies, and the submission workflow to maximize review impact.

This skill provides a comprehensive, reproducible rubric for evaluating scholarly and scientific work. It covers nine critical dimensions—including problem statement, methodology, data evidence, analysis rigor, and citation quality—making it ideal for reviewing research papers, grant proposals, literature reviews, and academic theses. Use it to provide structured, actionable, and professional feedback to enhance scholarly output.

This core skill is designed for academic publishing, combining deep AI research with structured, professional writing. It guides the creation of manuscripts using IMRAD structure and handles complex citation styles (APA, AMA, etc.). Crucially, it mandates the generation of graphical abstracts and rich technical schematics to ensure the highest level of visual rigor for research papers.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and polishing original long-form manuscripts intended for submission to high-level Pattern Recognition and AI journals. It details mandatory components, formatting standards, anti-plagiarism checks, and ethical guidelines, ensuring the paper meets rigorous peer-review standards for publication.