Skill UI

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for preparing Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscripts. It guides users through the complex submission pipeline by determining the optimal article type (e.g., Research Article, Critical Review, Policy Analysis) and the current stage of writing, ensuring the content maintains clear environmental significance. It routes users to specific sub-skills like data analysis, literature positioning, and writing style.

A comprehensive framework for ensuring rigorous scientific reproducibility in systems papers. It details how to establish a full provenance ledger (tracking hardware, software commits, and workloads), manage performance variance through repeated runs and statistical reporting, and implement automated pipelines so that all reported figures can be regenerated from raw data.

A comprehensive guide modeling the USENIX FAST conference submission review pipeline. It details the double-blind review process, the author-response period, and clarifies the four distinct outcomes (Accept, Shepherding, One-shot Revision, Reject). This resource helps authors understand the strategic implications of the review stages, especially how a one-shot revision differs from standard journal revisions, providing actionable advice for maximizing submission chances.

This guide provides a deep dive into the rigorous FOCS (Foundations of Computer Science) review process. It models the entire academic pipeline—from initial assignment and expert consultation to committee discussion and final decision—allowing authors to predict how their work will be evaluated based on correctness, novelty, and overall field contribution in a double-blind setting.

A comprehensive toolkit for validating and converting genomic interval coordinates across diverse file formats (e.g., BED, VCF, GFF/GTF, SAM/BAM) and assembly versions (e.g., GRCh37, GRCh38). It solves complex issues like 0-based vs 1-based conventions, half-open vs inclusive ranges, and variant representation normalization, ensuring data integrity in bioinformatics pipelines.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, double-blind, two-phase review process of the ACM/IEEE HRI conference. It breaks down every stage—from initial desk checks and track assignments to the critical author rebuttal and program-committee meetings. Learn where authors can maximize their impact, what reviewers prioritize (impact over polish), and how to strategically write rebuttals to influence the final decision.

A comprehensive guide detailing the ICASSP peer review pipeline, covering single-blind review mechanics, technical committee evaluation criteria, and the strategic importance of evidence, significance, and reproducibility in signal processing papers. Use this to craft submission strategies and decode decision letters.

A comprehensive guide modeling the ICCV review pipeline, covering the entire cycle from registration to final decision (March-June). It details author responsibilities, the enforcement of reviewer accountability, the prohibition of LLM use in reviews, and strategies for authors to interpret and leverage diverse review feedback, including utilizing the 'Findings' workshop.

This skill guides researchers through the entire end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a research paper to a journal. It structures a 12-step pipeline, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature review to experimentation, reproducibility, submission, peer review, revision, and final camera-ready versioning. It acts as a comprehensive project dashboard for managing the entire academic publishing journey.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the ICRA conference paper review process. Details the unique pipeline, from submission through the CEB review board, highlighting key structural differences from journal reviews. Special attention is paid to the absence of an author rebuttal phase, advising authors on strategies like anticipating objections, using video evidence, and maximizing clarity to improve acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide modeling the specific, single-round, double-anonymous review pipeline for IEEE ICSME submissions. It details the crucial early-decision cut (Accept, Reject, Response Recommended) and emphasizes that unlike journal submissions, there are no Major Revision rounds. Use this to strategically plan your research submission and response artifact.

A detailed guide to the INFOCOM conference submission and review pipeline. It explains the large-scale, TPC-driven process, including automated assignment, the critical early-reject screening phase, and how the lack of a traditional author rebuttal impacts defense writing. Essential reading for authors aiming to publish in top-tier networking venues.