Skill UI

Provides a comprehensive checklist for ensuring methodological rigor in clinical and observational studies. It covers mandatory prospective trial registration (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov), pre-specified protocols/SAP, and critical elements like randomization, blinding, and power calculation for RCTs. Essential for manuscript preparation and review.

This comprehensive guide provides a mandatory audit checklist for authors preparing papers for the MobiSys conference. It ensures adherence to strict academic publishing rules, covering essential steps like paper registration, maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to the 12-page limit, and avoiding common risks such as identity leaks or dual submissions. Use this to verify submission readiness before the final deadline.

A comprehensive skill guide for authors targeting Nature Human Behaviour. It assesses the fit of cross-disciplinary behavioral science manuscripts across psychology, neuroscience, economics, and sociology. The guide emphasizes open science practices, including preregistration, large-N designs, causal inference, and mandatory data transparency, ensuring submissions meet the journal's rigorous standards.

This tool provides a comprehensive checklist and rigor check for writing clinical studies for top-tier journals like NEJM. It emphasizes the mandatory requirements for prospective trial registration (ICMJE), pre-specification of Statistical Analysis Plans (SAP), and adherence to design principles (e.g., randomization, blinding, ITT). It helps authors identify critical methodological gaps before submission.

A comprehensive guide for project-managing the demanding lifecycle of submitting a top-tier systems conference paper (e.g., OSDI). Covers critical deadlines, from initial title registration and full submission to artifact preparation and final paper revisions. It provides strategies for navigating review outcomes, retargeting to other venues (SOSP, NSDI), and utilizing the silent window for continuous improvement.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting academic research papers to major conferences like PerCom. Covers critical steps including adhering to IEEE formatting standards, managing the two-step registration and submission deadlines, ensuring double-blind anonymity (leak detection), and providing necessary open-data and institutional ethics documentation. Essential for ensuring submissions meet high academic publication standards.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors preparing submissions for top-tier academic conferences like PODC. This guide covers critical submission stages, including the two-step abstract registration, selecting the appropriate paper track (Regular vs. Brief Announcement), adhering to the 10-page merits rule, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and ensuring the mathematical rigor of the proof. Use this before final submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end annual workflow for submitting to an academic conference. This resource covers critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper submission, review notification, and camera-ready preparation. It emphasizes strategic planning—such as timing proof completion and deciding between paper tracks—to maximize the chances of successful publication.

A comprehensive guide detailing the open science and reproducibility standards required for academic publications, especially those utilizing original data or conducting meta-science. It outlines critical steps such as data repository deposit, protocol preregistration, and reporting inter-rater reliability to ensure research methods are fully auditable.

This guide details the mandatory open science requirements for modern academic publishing, particularly in psychological sciences. It covers essential practices such as depositing open data and materials with DOIs, drafting a Research Transparency Statement, linking preregistrations, and properly handling exemptions. It ensures manuscripts meet the high standards of reproducibility and transparency required by top-tier journals.

This guide details the rigorous evaluation criteria used by top-tier psychological journals, focusing on the robustness, transparency, and quality of preregistration. It helps authors stress-test their manuscripts before submission, pre-empt common rejection reasons, and strategically shape their work to increase the likelihood of publication acceptance.

This skill guides the planning of psychological studies to meet the highest academic standards. It provides comprehensive methodologies for performing power analysis, justifying sample sizes, and implementing preregistration protocols. Use this when initiating a new research project or developing a pre-analysis plan to ensure the study design is robust and transparent.