Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for positioning theoretical algorithms research in top-tier venues like SODA. It details how to conduct a rigorous "related work" review, covering bound lineages across conference proceedings, journal publications, and arXiv preprints. Learn best practices for citing dual-version results, managing priority claims, and writing scholarly prose to establish your result's state-of-the-art status.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing and auditing submissions for SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms). Covers critical guidelines including the no-page-limit full version requirement, strict formatting rules (11pt, single column), lightweight double-blind rules, HotCRP mechanics, and an hour-by-hour checklist for the final submission window.

This guide details the structured process for preparing and evaluating research artifacts for major academic conferences like SOSP. It covers badge targeting (Functional, Reusable), cooperative evaluation expectations, and best practices for packaging system-level artifacts, including defining tiers (runnable, provided-hardware, documented-only) and conducting 'kick-the-tires' smoke tests.

This guide outlines the critical process of transforming an accepted academic submission into a final, camera-ready version for major conferences. It covers working effectively with a designated shepherd, managing strict page limits (13-14 pages), safely de-anonymizing the work, incorporating reviewer feedback, and adhering to strict ACM publication mechanics. It ensures the paper meets all professional standards for publication.

A comprehensive audit guide for preparing academic papers for the SOSP conference. This checklist details critical compliance points, including strict deadlines (abstract registration and full paper upload), strict formatting rules (12-page limit, two-column layout), robust anonymization techniques, and conflict declaration best practices. Use this before uploading any material to ensure high quality and avoid desk rejection.

Provides a comprehensive, annual workflow guide for submitting systems papers to top-tier academic conferences like SOSP, OSDI, and EuroSys. It details back-scheduling from initial abstract to final camera-ready submission, covering acceptance tracks, rejection strategies (retargeting), artifact generation, and logistical preparation across the entire academic research lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide for preparing the data, code, and materials transparency posture when submitting a manuscript to Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It clarifies the journal's guidelines (encouraged, not required) regarding data sharing, covering both quantitative and qualitative research methods while strictly adhering to ethical considerations and ASA norms.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It ensures that all tables and figures are self-contained, highly accessible, and correctly formatted according to the ASA Style Guide. The focus is on clearly communicating the 'structure–individual link' and presenting complex statistical results to a mixed sociology/psychology readership.

This skill polishes academic manuscripts specifically for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It ensures the writing adheres to the ASA Style Guide, manages strict word caps (abstract, article length), and refines the argument to resonate across both sociological and psychological traditions. Use it during drafting, polishing, or preparing for submission to refine prose, structure, and adherence to complex journal guidelines.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of academic manuscript preparation before submission. It covers critical areas including adherence to specific journal formatting (e.g., page-bottom footnotes), structural integrity, ethical compliance (anonymity), and content coherence. Use this tool to ensure your manuscript meets all current guidelines and minimizes rejection risks.

This comprehensive guide details the professional process for authors responding to external peer review feedback and preparing a revised manuscript. It teaches how to structure a detailed, point-by-point response, effectively address critiques using data and evidence, differentiate between accepted, clarified, and retained points, and maintain the utmost academic etiquette during the revision cycle.

A comprehensive, end-to-end guide for researchers aiming to publish high-impact manuscripts in top-tier journals like SCI. It meticulously maps the entire journey, from initial topic brainstorming and framework building to rigorous experimentation, submission auditing, revision, and final publication preparation. This skill minimizes common publication pitfalls and guides authors through the entire academic life cycle.